Heirs of Dutch inventor sue Facebook over “like” button

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Heirs of Dutch inventor sue Facebook over “like” button

A patent holding company representing the heirs of a dead Dutch programmer is suing Facebook over its “like” button and other features

Rembrandt Social Media, acting on behalf of the late Joannes Jozef Everardus van Der Meer, claims Facebook’s success can be partly attributed to using two of Van Der Meer's patents without authorisation.

The patents relate to technologies Van Der Meer used to build a prototype social network called Surfbook before his death in 2004. Surfbook was a social diary which allowed users to share information with contacts and approve some features using a “like” button.

According to court documents, Van Der Meer was granted the patents in 1998, five years before Facebook was launched. Rembrandt now owns the patents.

Facebook won't like this

Rembrandt, which is being represented by Fish & Richardson, has filed a lawsuit in Virginia. Facebook’s attorneys have not yet been identified in court papers.

In a recent survey, Fish & Richardson was the top-ranked firm by number of federal district court patent suits handled in 2011.

Rembrandt claims that Facebook bears “a remarkable resemblance, both in terms of its functionality and technical implementation” to Surfbook. According to the suit, one of Facebook's patents refers to Van Der Meer's patents, demonstrating that Facebook was aware of them.

"We believe Rembrandt's patents represent an important foundation of social media as we know it, and we expect a judge and jury to reach the same conclusion based on the evidence," said Fish & Richardson lawyer Tom Melsheimer in a statement.

The papers also say Facebook is aware of the patents as it has cited them in its own applications to patent some social networking technologies.

A second social media company called Add This was also cited in the lawsuit.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article