Heirs of Dutch inventor sue Facebook over “like” button

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Heirs of Dutch inventor sue Facebook over “like” button

A patent holding company representing the heirs of a dead Dutch programmer is suing Facebook over its “like” button and other features

Rembrandt Social Media, acting on behalf of the late Joannes Jozef Everardus van Der Meer, claims Facebook’s success can be partly attributed to using two of Van Der Meer's patents without authorisation.

The patents relate to technologies Van Der Meer used to build a prototype social network called Surfbook before his death in 2004. Surfbook was a social diary which allowed users to share information with contacts and approve some features using a “like” button.

According to court documents, Van Der Meer was granted the patents in 1998, five years before Facebook was launched. Rembrandt now owns the patents.

Facebook won't like this

Rembrandt, which is being represented by Fish & Richardson, has filed a lawsuit in Virginia. Facebook’s attorneys have not yet been identified in court papers.

In a recent survey, Fish & Richardson was the top-ranked firm by number of federal district court patent suits handled in 2011.

Rembrandt claims that Facebook bears “a remarkable resemblance, both in terms of its functionality and technical implementation” to Surfbook. According to the suit, one of Facebook's patents refers to Van Der Meer's patents, demonstrating that Facebook was aware of them.

"We believe Rembrandt's patents represent an important foundation of social media as we know it, and we expect a judge and jury to reach the same conclusion based on the evidence," said Fish & Richardson lawyer Tom Melsheimer in a statement.

The papers also say Facebook is aware of the patents as it has cited them in its own applications to patent some social networking technologies.

A second social media company called Add This was also cited in the lawsuit.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
Gift this article