Confusion over business methods debated in CLS v Alice today

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Confusion over business methods debated in CLS v Alice today

The Federal Circuit will consider questions which may redefine the law on US business method patents as it begins its en banc rehearing of CLS Bank v Alice today

The Court ordered the en banc rehearing after overturning its controversial 2-1 decision in July 2012 to affirm Alice’s patent claims for a computerised trading system which minimises risk.

The case, which dates back to CLS's 2007 suit seeking to invalidate Alice's patents, hinges on what constitutes a patent-ineligible abstract idea.

The judges have agreed to consider questions central to the confusion surrounding what constitutes patent eligibility under section 101. These include what test the court should adopt to determine whether a computer-implemented invention is an abstract idea and in what circumstances, if any, computer implementation makes an otherwise abstract idea patent-eligible.

The court will also attempt to decide whether it matters if the invention is claimed as a method, system, or storage medium, and whether such claims should at times be considered equivalent for section 101 purposes.

Mark Perry of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher is representing CLS Bank and CLS Services and Adam Perlman of Williams & Connolly is representing Alice in the case.

The recording of the en banc hearing will be available on the Federal Circuit’s website later today.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article