Judge issues blocking order in music copyright case

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Judge issues blocking order in music copyright case

A group of 10 record companies including EMI, Sony and Universal and Warner Music have won an order requiring the six largest UK internet service providers to block three Bittorrent indexing services

The order was granted today by Mr Justice Arnold, after he found that the Court had jurisdiction. He said the Court needed to satisfy four questions: (1) are the defendants service providers? (2) are the users and/or the operators of the websites infringing copyright? (3) do the users and/or the operators of the websites use the defendants' services to do that? (4) do the defendants have actual knowledge of this? Reviewing the facts and the law, he answered yes to each question.

The three Bittorrent indexing sites blocked are KAT, H33T and Fenopy. The ruling follows similar decisions involving Newzbin and Dramatico.

Since those decisions, the Austrian Supreme Court has referred two questions to the CJEU concerning infringement by users and operators (Case C-314/12 UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v Constantin Film Verleih GmbH). Arnold reviewed those questions but decided they did not affect the result of this case.

The music companies were represented by barristers Ian Mill QC, Edmund Cullen QC, Tom Richards and Shane Sibbel and law firm Forbes Anderson Free.

The ISPs (BSkyB, BT, Everything Everywhere, TalkTalk, Telefonica and Virgin Media) were not represented.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Earlier this month, Managing IP had exclusively reported that the French arm of Taylor Wessing was minded to pull out of the deal
Our latest podcast examines how Weil’s IP practice evolved, where its practitioners could (and will) go next, and which firms and markets stand to benefit from the redistribution of talent
Former Latham partner Chris Henry and transactions lawyer Liza Cotter are heading to the firm as Weil’s IP practice starts to disperse
Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
Gift this article