Judge issues blocking order in music copyright case

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Judge issues blocking order in music copyright case

A group of 10 record companies including EMI, Sony and Universal and Warner Music have won an order requiring the six largest UK internet service providers to block three Bittorrent indexing services

The order was granted today by Mr Justice Arnold, after he found that the Court had jurisdiction. He said the Court needed to satisfy four questions: (1) are the defendants service providers? (2) are the users and/or the operators of the websites infringing copyright? (3) do the users and/or the operators of the websites use the defendants' services to do that? (4) do the defendants have actual knowledge of this? Reviewing the facts and the law, he answered yes to each question.

The three Bittorrent indexing sites blocked are KAT, H33T and Fenopy. The ruling follows similar decisions involving Newzbin and Dramatico.

Since those decisions, the Austrian Supreme Court has referred two questions to the CJEU concerning infringement by users and operators (Case C-314/12 UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v Constantin Film Verleih GmbH). Arnold reviewed those questions but decided they did not affect the result of this case.

The music companies were represented by barristers Ian Mill QC, Edmund Cullen QC, Tom Richards and Shane Sibbel and law firm Forbes Anderson Free.

The ISPs (BSkyB, BT, Everything Everywhere, TalkTalk, Telefonica and Virgin Media) were not represented.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

After almost a quarter of a century, Marshall Gerstein has a new managing partner
Abbott winning another round against Sinocare and Menarini, and 'long arm' clarification on the UK's position within the UPC, were also among major developments
Maria Peyman, head of IP at Birketts, explains why the firm is adopting a ‘seamless approach’ for clients by integrating two of its practice areas
Matthew Swinn, who leads the firm’s IP practice, discusses why Mallesons is well-placed to remain a major IP force
Lawyers at A&O Shearman analyse developments regarding UPC’s long-arm jurisdiction, including its scope and jurisdictional limits
Michelle Lee discusses reaching milestones at the USPTO, AI’s role in legal work, and how to empower women in tech and IP
Executive chair Matt Dixon, who reveals a new associate hire, says the firm wants to offer a realistic pathway to partnership while avoiding the ‘corporate machine’ route
Mayer Brown’s role in cardiovascular technology dispute reflects how firms are pursuing precedent-setting cases to try and guide AI and patent law
Kevin Mack, Via’s new president, emphasises the importance of collaborative licensing structures and shares how AI tools can help create new lines of business
A Tokyo District Court ruling concerning movie spoilers, and a second chance for VLSI against Intel were also among the top talking points
Gift this article