EU set for harmonised rules on trade secrets

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU set for harmonised rules on trade secrets

The European Commission has today proposed a directive on trade secrets to replace the patchwork of rules across the EU

The draft directive introduces a common definition of trade secrets, sets out procedures for victims of trade secret misappropriation to seek redress and introduces measures that courts may use to avoid leakage of trade secrets submitted to it in the course of civil litigation on trade secrets theft.

The proposed rules come after officials in Brussels commissioned a study and held a public consultation on the issue. It concluded that businesses find it hard to understand the rules on trade secrets across the EU and are reluctant to sue alleged infringers for fear that the courts will not keep their trade secrets confidential.

The Commission says that one in five European companies has been the victim of trade secret misappropriation, or attempts at misappropriation, at least once in the past 10 years.

Vice-President Antonio Tajani said that protecting trade secrets is particularly important for smaller businesses, which rely more heavily on trade secret protection than larger companies – in part because of the cost of patenting and protection against infringement.

At the moment, 18 EU member states have laws on misappropriation of trade secrets, although some, including Germany and Spain, do not define what trade secrets are. In Belgium, France, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands and the UK there are no specific provisions on trade secrets in civil law. Trade secrets are only protected by contract in Cyprus, while in France misappropriation of manufacturing secrets is a criminal offence if committed by employees.

The Commission says that the new proposal will align the rules in the EU with civil law rules in Japan and the US.

The draft directive will now go before the Council of Ministers and the European Parliament for adoption.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Practitioners say the UK Supreme Court’s decision could boost the attractiveness of the UK for AI companies
New awards, including US ‘Firm of the Year’ and Latin America ‘Firm to Watch’, are among more than 90 prizes that will recognise firms and practitioners
DWF helped client Dairy UK secure a major victory at the UK Supreme Court
Hepworth Browne led Emotional Perception AI to victory at the UK Supreme Court, which rejected a previous appellate decision that said an AI network was not patentable
James Hill, general counsel at Norwich City FC, reveals how he balances fan engagement with brand enforcement, and when he calls on IP firms for advice
In the second of a two-part article, Gabrielle Faure-André and Stéphanie Garçon at Santarelli unpick EPO, UPC and French case law to assess the importance of clinical development timelines in inventive step analyses
Public figures are turning to trademark protection to combat the threat of AI deepfakes and are monetising their brand through licensing deals, a trend that law firms are keen to capitalise on
News of Avanci Video signing its first video licence and a win for patent innovators in Australia were also among the top talking points
Tom Melsheimer, part of a nine-partner team to join King & Spalding from Winston & Strawn, says the move reflects Texas’s appeal as a venue for high-stakes patent litigation
AI patents and dairy trademarks are at the centre of two judgments to be handed down next week
Gift this article