Europeans’ IP habits laid bare

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Europeans’ IP habits laid bare

Nine out of 10 Europeans have not bought counterfeit products or downloaded illegally in the past 12 months, according to a report on perceptions of IP published by OHIM this week

The report was based on research among people in the 28 EU member states. Among its findings were:

  • 9% of citizens have accessed/downloaded or streamed illegal content from the internet intentionally in the past 12 months

  • 4% have purchased counterfeit goods intentionally, while 6% have purchased counterfeit goods as a result of being misled

  • 34% say that buying counterfeit goods allows making a smart purchase, while 38% say it is an act of protest against large premium brands

  • 22% consider it acceptable to download illegal content when there is no legal alternative, and 42% consider it is acceptable when it is for personal use

  • 96% say it is important that inventors, performers and creative artists can protect their rights and be paid for their work; 86% agree protecting IP is important for improving and guaranteeing the quality of products and services

  • 81% agree with the statement “buying counterfeit products ruins businesses and jobs”

  • 84% disagree with the statement “it is acceptable to buy counterfeit products when it concerns luxury products” while 75% disagree with “it is acceptable to buy counterfeit products when the price for the original is too high”

  • 73% state that they have a good understanding of “intellectual property” but only 13% demonstrate a good knowledge

The report concluded that “IP and its main related terms are more heard than really understood in detail by Europeans”.

The research was carried out by Edelman Berland from December 2012 to August 2013. It comprised a literature review, qualitative investigation and quantitative stage.

The research covered all 28 EU member states, while in-depth interviews and focus groups were held in nine representative member states. In total, over 26,500 Europeans expressed their views through a telephone questionnaire.

The report also examines activity by demographic. For example, 26% of 15 to 24 year olds had downloaded or accessed copyright-protected content illegally in the past 12 months, while men were twice as likely to download illegally as women.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
Gift this article