New IP-specialist judge appointed in UK

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New IP-specialist judge appointed in UK

Barrister Richard Hacon has been named as the successor to Colin Birss as the judge of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC, formerly the Patents County Court) in London

haconrichard.jpg

His appointment, which had been widely expected, fills a vacancy which arose when Birss was appointed a judge of the High Court in May this year.

Hacon is a member of the IP specialist chambers 11 South Square, and has experience in patent cases as well as those involving other IP rights.

He is aged 57 and was called to the bar in 1979 but was not a Queen’s Counsel. He takes up his new post on December 3.

Among the cases he has worked on recently are Starbucks v BSkyB (trade marks), Apple v Samsung (designs) and Lumos Skincare v Sweet Squared (passing off).

The announcement does not say if Hacon has been appointed chair of the Copyright Tribunal, a post that has lately also been held by the judge of the PCC.

The IPEC handles lower-value or less complex IP cases in England and Wales and was profiled in Managing IP's April 2013 issue ("How the PCC became a global player").

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article