Twitter accused of infringing IBM patents days before IPO

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Twitter accused of infringing IBM patents days before IPO

Twitter has received a letter from IBM accusing it of infringing at least three IBM patents just days before the social networking site's Initial Public Offering

The allegation was revealed by Twitter in an S-1 filing used by companies to register their assets with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In the letter sent by IBM, the technology company invited Twitter's executives "to negotiate a business resolution of the allegations".

The patents in question are US Patent No 6,957,224, which covers the efficient retrieval of uniform resource locators; No 7,072,849, which protects a method for presenting advertising in an interactive service; and No 7,099,862, which relates to programmatic discovery of common contacts.

In filing, Twitter admits that its IP portfolio is smaller than that of many of its competitors, and notes that NPEs "often attempt to aggressively assert claims in order to extract value from technology companies".

But the company says of the IBM letter: "We believe we have meritorious defenses to IBM's allegations, although there can be no assurance that we will be successful in defending against these allegations or reaching a business resolution that is satisfactory to us".

Despite the accusation, Twitter said in the SEC filing that it plans to offer its stock for between $23 and $25 a share - up from the previous asking price of between $17 and $20. The increase values the company at $17 billion, compared to the previous valuation of $11 billion.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inùs Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article