Bill aims to solve USPTO funding crisis

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Bill aims to solve USPTO funding crisis

A bill has been introduced in the House of Representatives that would finally end the diversion of USPTO fees away from the agency

HR3349 – To provide for the permanent funding of the USPTO, and for other purposes, was sponsored by Rep John Conyers and three other Representatives on October 28 and referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Under the proposal, a revolving fund would be created in which USPTO fee revenues would be deposited. Revenues would be solely for use by the Office, and it would no longer be subject to the annual appropriations process.

Hopes that the America Invents Act would solve the USPTO’s funding problems have come to naught so far. Sequestration has led to hundreds of millions of dollars being diverted from the USPTO to other government work.

In an interview published in the AIPLA Daily Report last week, USPTO Deputy Director Teresa Stanek Rea said sequestration is “likely to have long-term negative implications across all parts” of the USPTO, meaning that patent backlog and pendency will increase.

Stanek Rea said the Agency planned to hire 750 new examiners in each of 2014 and 2015 to cope with the growing number of patent applications. Thanks to sequestration, it has halted most hiring, cut some outreach and education work and delayed moving into permanent space in the satellite offices in Dallas, Denver and Silicon Valley. It has also had to cut back on IT developments.

Welcoming the latest bill, AIPLA Executive Director Q Todd Dickinson said: “The time has come for Congress to provide the USPTO with the ability to do the work its customers pay for by ending the possibility of fee diversion, once and for all.”

During a Congressional hearing on the Innovation Act on Tuesday, former USPTO Director David Kappos also welcomed the Conyers bill.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
Gift this article