Bill aims to solve USPTO funding crisis

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Bill aims to solve USPTO funding crisis

A bill has been introduced in the House of Representatives that would finally end the diversion of USPTO fees away from the agency

HR3349 – To provide for the permanent funding of the USPTO, and for other purposes, was sponsored by Rep John Conyers and three other Representatives on October 28 and referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Under the proposal, a revolving fund would be created in which USPTO fee revenues would be deposited. Revenues would be solely for use by the Office, and it would no longer be subject to the annual appropriations process.

Hopes that the America Invents Act would solve the USPTO’s funding problems have come to naught so far. Sequestration has led to hundreds of millions of dollars being diverted from the USPTO to other government work.

In an interview published in the AIPLA Daily Report last week, USPTO Deputy Director Teresa Stanek Rea said sequestration is “likely to have long-term negative implications across all parts” of the USPTO, meaning that patent backlog and pendency will increase.

Stanek Rea said the Agency planned to hire 750 new examiners in each of 2014 and 2015 to cope with the growing number of patent applications. Thanks to sequestration, it has halted most hiring, cut some outreach and education work and delayed moving into permanent space in the satellite offices in Dallas, Denver and Silicon Valley. It has also had to cut back on IT developments.

Welcoming the latest bill, AIPLA Executive Director Q Todd Dickinson said: “The time has come for Congress to provide the USPTO with the ability to do the work its customers pay for by ending the possibility of fee diversion, once and for all.”

During a Congressional hearing on the Innovation Act on Tuesday, former USPTO Director David Kappos also welcomed the Conyers bill.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brandsmiths and Powell Gilbert will contest claims over several UK trademarks in a High Court case examining the ownership and revival of a heritage brand
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is taking a fresh strategic approach to pricing in its AI strategy. It could amplify calls for law firms to ditch the billable hour
Charles Harding plans to build a new team around life sciences oppositions and contentious work, drawing on his three decades developing a practice from scratch at D Young & Co
The firm reveals how its litigation strategies informed the arguments that took Masimo’s judgment past $818 million
The firm was rebuilding its IP practice through a string of patent hires and a Texas expansion, but its dissolution has put the newly built talent back into the market
AI can exploit longstanding gaps in copyright protection at remarkable speed, but EU law still provides tools to fight back, says Simon Hembt at Bird & Bird
The firm has tapped a local patent trio to establish a foothold in the market and broaden its national presence
New Asia-Pacific IP head Jonathan Chu is eyeing opportunities arising from Chinese technology licensing, overseas enforcement and increasingly IP-heavy cross-border deals
Europe’s largest intellectual property convention and trade fair is back: IP Service World 2026 takes place in Munich from November 23–25 – the 16th edition, with 1,400-plus attendees from 55-plus nations, 100-plus speakers, and 100-plus exhibitors. Three days. Two focused areas. One IP marketplace.
Mehmet Gün and Uğur Aktekin discuss four decades of change in Türkiye’s legal market, the firm’s commitment to independence and the challenge of building an institution that can outlast its founders
Gift this article