Seiko scores big in UDRP case

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Seiko scores big in UDRP case

Japanese watchmaker Seiko has won a UDRP case concerning 138 domain names registered by 106 respondents

In a decision dated August 6, panellist Alistair Payne found that all of the domain names were registered and used in bad faith.

Nearly all of the domains, which were registered under .com and .info, comprised the word Seiko followed by a dictionary word.

Examples were seiko2013.info, seikoshops.info, watch-sieko-japan.com and seikobreast.com. The domains were registered between July 27 2012 and January 12 2013.

Payne noted that despite the 106 different owners, there was evidence of common control over the domain names and/or the websites to which they resolved, including obviously fake physical addresses, the same registration dates, resolving to the same or similar websites, the same hosting service, the use of only two registrars and the close similarity between each domain.

He concluded that “on the balance of probabilities it is most likely that the disputed domain names are controlled by the same person or entity” and that therefore the cases could be consolidated into a single proceeding.

Seiko claimed the domains were all resolving to sites selling goods, including fake Seiko watches – though it was not able to provide evidence of counterfeits bought from the sites.

“The Panel notes that the type of wholesale cyber-squatting in relation to a well-known mark as demonstrated in this case is exactly the sort of conduct that is intended to be deterred by the Policy,” wrote Payne.

Seiko was represented by Sanderson & Co in the UK. The respondents did not reply and were not represented.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article