Obama administration vetoes ITC ban against Apple

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Obama administration vetoes ITC ban against Apple

President Obama’s administration has vetoed a US trade commission’s ban on the sale and import of certain Apple products that infringed a Samsung patent

The veto overrides an International Trade Commission (ITC) decision on case 337-794 in June, which banned the sale and import of AT&T models of the iPhone 4, iPhone 3GS, iPad 3G and iPad 2 3G. The order was based on the ITC’s finding that Apple infringed Samsung’s patent claims covering 3G wireless technology. Samsung had also argued that Apple had infringed another three patents, but the ITC disagreed.

The veto was announced on Sunday by US Trade Representative Michael Froman, who said he had made the decision partially because of the “effect on competitive conditions in the US economy and the effect on US consumers.” The last presidential veto of a product ban was in 1987.

The patent at issue is classified as standards essential, meaning it must be licensed under fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms. The veto is likely to affect other standards essential patents.

Samsung will still be able to pursue a patent infringement claim against Apple through the courts.

Samsung said in a statement that it is "disappointed" that the ban has been overturned. "The ITC's decision correctly recognized that Samsung has been negotiating in good faith and that Apple remains unwilling to take a license," it said.

Apple said in a statement: “We applaud the Administration for standing up for innovation in this landmark case. Samsung was wrong to abuse the patent system in this way.”

The news is the latest installment in a long-running battle between the two companies over Smartphone technology.


more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article