Obama administration vetoes ITC ban against Apple

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Obama administration vetoes ITC ban against Apple

President Obama’s administration has vetoed a US trade commission’s ban on the sale and import of certain Apple products that infringed a Samsung patent

The veto overrides an International Trade Commission (ITC) decision on case 337-794 in June, which banned the sale and import of AT&T models of the iPhone 4, iPhone 3GS, iPad 3G and iPad 2 3G. The order was based on the ITC’s finding that Apple infringed Samsung’s patent claims covering 3G wireless technology. Samsung had also argued that Apple had infringed another three patents, but the ITC disagreed.

The veto was announced on Sunday by US Trade Representative Michael Froman, who said he had made the decision partially because of the “effect on competitive conditions in the US economy and the effect on US consumers.” The last presidential veto of a product ban was in 1987.

The patent at issue is classified as standards essential, meaning it must be licensed under fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms. The veto is likely to affect other standards essential patents.

Samsung will still be able to pursue a patent infringement claim against Apple through the courts.

Samsung said in a statement that it is "disappointed" that the ban has been overturned. "The ITC's decision correctly recognized that Samsung has been negotiating in good faith and that Apple remains unwilling to take a license," it said.

Apple said in a statement: “We applaud the Administration for standing up for innovation in this landmark case. Samsung was wrong to abuse the patent system in this way.”

The news is the latest installment in a long-running battle between the two companies over Smartphone technology.


more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article