We need to fix software patents, says outgoing Kappos

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

We need to fix software patents, says outgoing Kappos

In one of his final interviews before leaving office as USPTO Director, David Kappos identified “software and software patenting” as the biggest challenge for his successor.

Speaking to Managing IP before he leaves the USPTO this Friday, Kappos said: “There’s been a lot of controversy over the smartphone patent wars and section 101 on the software side and all of that is important, but there’s also an operational aspect to it.”

David Kappos

David Kappos

He added: “We already have several initiatives underway, including roundtables on the east and west coasts, but that’s going to need to continue. We’re not done until the software industry says we got it right.”

Looking back on his four-year term, Kappos declined to single out anything in particular he is proudest of: “There’s not any one thing, but the giant slate of things we have undertaken and the dizzying array of things we’ve done. When you line up all the projects next to one another, it’s pretty overwhelming.”

He also provided two bits of advice to his (as yet unnamed) successor: listen to your stakeholders and use their guidance and partner with your workforce, especially labour unions.

The full exclusive interview is only available on managingip.com (subscription or free trial required).

Kappos’s comments come as the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit prepares to rehear en banc the controversial business method patents case CLS v Alice next week.

The Court has overturned its split decision in July last year to uphold Alice’s patent claims for a computerised trading system which minimises risk.

In 2010 the US Supreme Court said the Federal Circuit’s machine-or-transformation test should not be “the sole test” for patent eligibility.

Meanwhile, the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board has decided its first case under the new Covered Business Method review procedure, SAP v Versata.

The implications of the CLS v Alice hearing and the SAP v Versata decision are discussed further in Federal Circuit and USPTO seek to clarify business method patents (subscription or free trial required).



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Europe’s largest intellectual property convention and trade fair is back: IP Service World 2026 takes place in Munich from November 23–25 – the 16th edition, with 1,400-plus attendees from 55-plus nations, 100-plus speakers, and 100-plus exhibitors. Three days. Two focused areas. One IP marketplace.
Mehmet Gün and Uğur Aktekin discuss four decades of change in Türkiye’s legal market, the firm’s commitment to independence and the challenge of building an institution that can outlast its founders
Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
Gift this article