The IP Survey is the industry's biggest, oldest and most detailed analysis of the leading patent firms worldwide. This year there are some interesting changes, reflecting mergers in Australia, new firms in Europe and new practices in the United States. For the first time the researchers behind the rankings have also written features around the issues they came across, from how the prosecution industry in Europe is changing to the way big US filers distribute their work.
As in previous years, this issue only features the patent rankings. The trade mark rankings will be released with the March issue and copyright with April.
How the biggest US patent filers distribute their work
Who will benefit from a single European court system?
What the unitary patent means for patent attorneys
The IP Survey consists of rankings of the leading firms practising intellectual property in each country, presented in tiers. The total number of firms listed in each jurisdiction varies according to the size of the market. The survey is not an exhaustive list of every firm in each jurisdiction; even firms listed in the lower tiers have been recommended by a number of practitioners and deserve congratulations on their inclusion.
The editorial to go with the rankings, including extensive coverage and analysis of countries - and regions, in the case India, China and the United States - will be available online during May. They will then be printed in the annual IP Handbook. For the first time this year, the IP Handbook will also feature IP Stars - the leading practitioners at the listed firms that received particular recommendation during Managing IP's research.
The Managing IP awards, presented in London for the global awards and Washington, DC for the North America awards, are based upon the same extensive research but aim to reward firms that have had a particularly good year in 2012. These rankings, by contrast, reflect a firm's standing in the market over several years.
How the results are compiled
A team of researchers based in London, Hong Kong and New York contacted firms in more than 80 jurisdictions to ask them for information and feedback on the rankings. Client feedback was also considered. Based on this research, firms are ranked in tiers in each jurisdiction. In most jurisdictions, there are separate tables for prosecution and contentious work.
Prosecution work includes filing of patents and associated work in that jurisdiction, including filing for overseas clients. Contentious work includes all other legal work, such as enforcement and licensing. The tiers reflect the perception of the leading firms in each market, with the top tier listing those firms regarded as having the strongest practices in each category. Within each tier, firms are listed alphabetically.
No one outside of Managing IP has seen the rankings before publication. No firm can vote for its own inclusion, or recommend an associated or sister firm in another jurisdiction. The rankings reflect the state of the market when the research was conducted, between September 2012 and January 2013. Managing IP itself does not recommend or endorse any particular firms.
|Highlights from this year's client research|
"If I were on Who Wants to be a Millionaire and I had an IP question, I'd use a lifeline to call John Pegram"
"You should see this guy, he really lurks around the courtroom"
"Peter made what I had been led to believe would be a 'throw a cold towel over the head' moment into fun"
"In court a litigator defines the company, and he represents what we are – cutting edge and dynamic"
"Alicia is – simply put – one of my most valued lawyers anywhere in the world"
|The biggest moves in 2013|
The material on this site is for law firms, companies and other IP specialists. It is for information only. Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Notice before using the site. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws.
© 2020 Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC. For help please see our FAQs.