Bill proposes exempting USPTO from budget sequestration

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Bill proposes exempting USPTO from budget sequestration

A bill has been introduced to the US Congress proposing to exempt the USPTO from funding cuts as a result of budget sequestration

The Patents And Trademarks Encourage New Technology (PATENT) Jobs Act , introduced by Representatives Mike Honda, Zoe Lofgren and Anna Eshoo, would exempt the Office from budget cuts from 2014 to 2021.

A press release from Honda claims that if legislation is not passed, the USPTO will not be able to open five new patent offices around the country, including one in Silicon Valley. Honda said that an exception should be made for the USPTO because, unlike other government agencies, it is funded entirely by fees paid to the Office.

Honda also expressed concern about the Office’s backlog of 640,000 applicants, which the planned new locations are designed to ease.

In May, AIPLA president Jeff Lewis wrote to the Office of Management and Budget protesting against sequestration being applied to the USPTO. Lewis, writing on behalf of AIPLA’s 15,000 members, said recent progress in reducing the backlog is likely to be undermined by sequestration.

In a statement today, AIPLA executive director Q Todd Dickinson welcomed the proposed legislation.

“We believe that Rep. Honda's bill recognizes the unique fee-funded status of the USPTO and provides the best chance of ensuring the necessary funding for effective implementation of the AIA," said Dickinson.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article