Pooley sets out three ways to improve the PCT
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Pooley sets out three ways to improve the PCT

Quality, cooperation and efficiency are the three priorities as WIPO works to enhance the PCT, Deputy Director General James Pooley said last week

Speaking at the Managing IP US Patent Forum in Washington DC, Pooley said the PCT is now central to “what we all do now in a very globalised economy”. He noted that it had grown rapidly: there were just 459 PCT applications in its first year but it expects to receive some 200,000 this year.

Pooley said that the PCT system “works reasonably well” but that “there is still work to be done”. He added: “The future of the PCT is about more cooperation, better tools and a constant response to a changing global environment.”

In particular, he said work is taking place to improve quality, cooperation and access/efficiency.

Regarding quality, international search authorities have agreed to focus on the quality of the international search report and agree on metrics to measure the quality of that work product. A quality sub-group has been set up and is discussing issues including the timeliness of international search reports. “Members have really engaged on these issues and we have seen a lot of progress,” said Pooley.

He added that third-party observations for the PCT started as a pilot project last July and are so far “working extremely well”. He said they would prove helpful in the national phase.

WIPO has also set up mechanisms enabling offices to comment on the work product, and feedback information on citations.

Alongside this, national offices are trying to improve cooperation by sharing search strategies so they can better understand the work product received. Under a pilot project involving the USPTO, EPO and KIPO, teams of people working on the same case share information as they go along – with one office leading on each case.

Pooley said this project has produced “very high value feedback”: in more than 60% of cases information was exchanged that would not otherwise have come to a single office; and at least one added was added in 87% of cases. According to a survey of participants, 92% felt quality was higher, and 30% felt the difference was very significant.

“This was all achieved without any special IT tools other than email and normal communications technologies,” said Pooley. He added: “We have also seen the benefit of increased industry participation.”

Further work is under way to improve access and efficiency, with the digital access service, machine translation and PCT-PPH. “PCT work product is now the leading entry point for accelerated examination in the national phase,” said Pooley.

The next step, he said, is ePCT – bringing communication into a web-based environment using one electronic platform.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partners at Foley Hoag and Kilburn & Strode explore how US and UK courts have addressed questions of AI and inventorship
In-house lawyers have considerable influence over law firms’ actions, so they must use that power to push their external advisers to adopt sustainable practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Counsel say they’re advising clients to keep a close eye on confidentiality agreements after the FTC voted to ban non-competes
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows US firms making major swoops for IP teams, while South Korea has also been a buoyant market
The finalists for the 13th annual awards have been announced
Counsel reveal how a proposal to create separate briefings for discretionary denials at the USPTO could affect their PTAB strategies
The UK Supreme Court rejected the firm’s appeal against an earlier ruling because it did not raise an arguable point of law
Loes van den Winkel, attorney at Arnold & Siedsma, explains why clients' enthusiasm is contagious and why her job does not mean managing fashion models
Allen & Gledhill partner Jia Yi Toh shares her experience of representing the winning team in the first-ever case filed under Singapore’s new fast-track IP dispute resolution system
Gift this article