Google reveals 11,348% increase in copyright takedown requests

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Google reveals 11,348% increase in copyright takedown requests

The number of URLs Google was asked to remove from search results has increased by 11,348% in less than two years, according to a transparency report released by the search engine yesterday.

Some 56,874 requests to remove a URL on copyright grounds were submitted in the week of August 2011, compared to 6,510,714 requests in the week of November 18, 2013. While there is some fluctuation in the numbers from week to week, a graph of takedown requests shows a sharp upwards trend.

The figures also suggest that a relatively small number of alleged copyright owners and their representatives are issuing a large number of requests. Just 3,779 copyright owners and 1,975 reporting organisations, which generally work on their behalf, requested the removal of 23,945,710 URLs.

A FAQ accompanying the figures suggests that Google considered most of the complaints to be genuine. The search engine complied with 97% of the takedown requests it received between July and December 2011.

However, it appeared that a minority of those issuing takedown requests were either ignorant of copyright law or attempting to use it for nefarious purposes. Examples of requests Google received but did not comply with included a company requesting the removal of an employee's blog posts about unfair treatment, a driving school requesting the removal of a competitor's site on the grounds it copied an alphabetised list of cities, and an individual requesting the removal of links to court proceedings identifying her on the grounds that her name was copyrightable.

Google said that where legally permissible to do so, it attempts to notify webmasters whose sites are the subject of takedown requests and shares a copy of such requests with the publicly available Chilling Effects website.

The top five reporting organisations by number of takedowns requested in the past month were Degban with 5,483,209 URLs, BPI with 4,273,417 URLs, Recording Industry Association of America with 2,619,151 URLs, Fox Group Legal with 1,206,901 URLs and Unidam with 1,129,975 URLs.

The top five copyright owners by number of takedowns requested in the past month were BPI member companies, with 4,273,417 URLs, RIAA member companies, with 2,619,151 URLs, Hydentra, with 1,808,821 URLs, XFC, with 1,295,697 URLs and Fox with 1,206,901 URLs. 

A complete list of all copyright removal requests Google is able to publish can be found here

The Transparency Report also included data about government requests to remove content and requests for information about Google users.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Sim & San, which secured the $16m victory for their client, previously led Communications Components Antenna to a $26m damages win in 2024
IP litigator Ruth Hoy has led the London office since 2022
Emotional Perception AI is seeking more than £200,000 after the UK Supreme Court backed its appeal
Lawyers at Pinsent Masons discuss why the advent of ‘AI-free’ might be a crucial moment for brands seeking to protect their identity
Newly independent King & Wood has established offices in North America, while Mallesons has entered a ‘new era’ with a 1,200-lawyer firm across Australia and Singapore
Ryan Dykal and John Wittenzellner of Boies Schiller Flexner tell Managing IP what’s driving the firm’s patent litigation expansion
News of Dolby suing Snap over AV1 and HEVC patents and SCOTUS offering guidance on the liability of internet service providers were also among the top talking points
Arrival of Caitlin Heard will bolster the soon-to-be-created Ashurst Perkins Coie’s IP presence in the capital
AI, cybersecurity and data practice group will provide clients with legal guidance around AI alongside a 'deep technical foundation’ in IP
Lawyers at Vondst and Biopatents say a ruling concerning the protected status of trade secrets could see the UPC flooded with requests to prevent access to confidential information
Gift this article