Notably, this month, we re-publish our latest sponsored roundtable on litigation in Latin America, featuring contributions from Argentina, Brazil and Mexico as well as from the UK and US IP attachés.
The discussion covered a range of issues, but speed and predictability in the courts topped people’s concerns.
UK IP attaché Sheila Alves said: “The most complaints I have heard is that it is too slow to litigate in Brazil, and there is a lack of specialised judges,” while Albert Keyack, her US counterpart, added: “Part of the slowness complaint is that the Brazilian PTO has a backlog. However the government has recently given them more resources to hire more examiners, which is welcome. I think you will see those complaints become less prominent as the speed of examination improves.”
Areas where improvements are needed include damages claims, preliminary injunctions and judicial training, said the participants. “We require certain guidelines to decide the proof of experts for infringement and cancellation cases. We need more guidelines to evaluate and apply the decisions on technical evidence,” said Alejandro Luna of Olivares & Cia.
Alberto Guerra of Guerra Law added: “The other thing is to improve the quality of judges and in particular experts, who have a very important role in patent litigation because the judges do not understand the technology.”
In-house counsel Gabriela Duran of One-Red Argentina (left) sounded an optimistic note: “Overall, I am optimistic that things have improved since IP rights started to be more relevant in Latin America. And yes! We still have a long road ahead of us, but we have improved in the past, and we still do it.”
The December/January issue also includes many contributions from our international briefings correspondents in various countries.
These cover issues such as the moves towards a single patent system in Australia and New Zealand; the examination of foreign trade mark applications in China; the amended Rule 164 at the EPO; why the patent invalidation rate at the JPO is falling; and lessons on intent-to-use applications from a US trade mark case involving Polo.
Here are all this month’s briefings:
The roundtable and the international briefings are sponsored by the participating firms.
The material on this site is for law firms, companies and other IP specialists. It is for information only. Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Notice before using the site. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws.
© 2020 Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC. For help please see our FAQs.