MEPs vote on tobacco packaging

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

MEPs vote on tobacco packaging

Proponents of plain packaging for tobacco suffered a blow yesterday when MEPs voted to water down proposals to require tobacco companies to cover three-quarters of the product’s packaging in health warnings

At the moment, health warnings need to cover at least 30% of the area of the front of the pack and 40% of the back. The European Commission had proposed increasing this to 75%, but MEPs opted for 65% coverage.

Linda McAvan, the UK Labour MEP steering the legislation on the Tobacco Product Directive, said the vote “gained agreement for graphic health warnings (front and back) which will cover 65% of cigarette packages across Europe, taking a big step towards plain packaging”.

Groups of IP owners including Marques and ECTA had urged MEPs to reject plain packaging, describing it as an “excessive measure restricting normal use of trade marks”.

MEPs will now negotiate a first-reading agreement with EU ministers. Once the legislation is approved by the Council and Parliament, member states will have 18 months in which to translate the directive into their national laws.

Debates over the efficacy and legality of plain packaging are taking place around the world. Australia’s plain packaging legislation is being challenged at the WTO. Last week UK charity the British Heart Foundation said a cross-country survey it carried out showed that only a third of UK teenagers are deterred from smoking by current cigarette packs, compared to almost half in Australia, where packs are almost entirely covered by graphic warnings.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Apple’s lawsuit against OpenAI, which features Tier 1-ranked disputes firms on both sides, reflects how trade secrets litigation is becoming a prominent competition feature
Drew & Napier’s leadership appointments show one way full-service firms can back up claims about the strategic importance of IP
Strike-out application will hear claims that the copyright aspect of an IP infringement claim brought by a gambling and sports betting group should be dropped
Amongst a sea of mergers, Lathrop GPM and HG Law have set out plans to combine, positioning themselves to compete with both IP boutiques and full-service firms
Patrícia Paias explains why she loves the science and business behind an idea and why potential rights owners must avoid the ‘file and forget’ philosophy
Lawyers eagerly await news of what IP specialist Sir Colin Birss will bring to one of the England and Wales judiciary’s most important roles
María Aurora García of Berken IP explains how intellectual property rights holders can use customs monitoring and online enforcement tools to identify parallel imports and support compliance with consumer protection rules
The Jakarta-based firm says personal networks and a distinctive strategy can help it guide foreign clients through what can be a tricky IP landscape
Munich litigation boutique formed by former Taylor Wessing partners continues expansion as it seeks to cement its position in the UPC market
Yvonne Tang and Siau Wen Lim, the second and third IP specialists to sit on the firm’s management committee, say IP is ‘uniquely positioned’ to support cross-practice work
Gift this article