MEPs vote on tobacco packaging

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

MEPs vote on tobacco packaging

Proponents of plain packaging for tobacco suffered a blow yesterday when MEPs voted to water down proposals to require tobacco companies to cover three-quarters of the product’s packaging in health warnings

At the moment, health warnings need to cover at least 30% of the area of the front of the pack and 40% of the back. The European Commission had proposed increasing this to 75%, but MEPs opted for 65% coverage.

Linda McAvan, the UK Labour MEP steering the legislation on the Tobacco Product Directive, said the vote “gained agreement for graphic health warnings (front and back) which will cover 65% of cigarette packages across Europe, taking a big step towards plain packaging”.

Groups of IP owners including Marques and ECTA had urged MEPs to reject plain packaging, describing it as an “excessive measure restricting normal use of trade marks”.

MEPs will now negotiate a first-reading agreement with EU ministers. Once the legislation is approved by the Council and Parliament, member states will have 18 months in which to translate the directive into their national laws.

Debates over the efficacy and legality of plain packaging are taking place around the world. Australia’s plain packaging legislation is being challenged at the WTO. Last week UK charity the British Heart Foundation said a cross-country survey it carried out showed that only a third of UK teenagers are deterred from smoking by current cigarette packs, compared to almost half in Australia, where packs are almost entirely covered by graphic warnings.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article