MEPs vote on tobacco packaging

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

MEPs vote on tobacco packaging

Proponents of plain packaging for tobacco suffered a blow yesterday when MEPs voted to water down proposals to require tobacco companies to cover three-quarters of the product’s packaging in health warnings

At the moment, health warnings need to cover at least 30% of the area of the front of the pack and 40% of the back. The European Commission had proposed increasing this to 75%, but MEPs opted for 65% coverage.

Linda McAvan, the UK Labour MEP steering the legislation on the Tobacco Product Directive, said the vote “gained agreement for graphic health warnings (front and back) which will cover 65% of cigarette packages across Europe, taking a big step towards plain packaging”.

Groups of IP owners including Marques and ECTA had urged MEPs to reject plain packaging, describing it as an “excessive measure restricting normal use of trade marks”.

MEPs will now negotiate a first-reading agreement with EU ministers. Once the legislation is approved by the Council and Parliament, member states will have 18 months in which to translate the directive into their national laws.

Debates over the efficacy and legality of plain packaging are taking place around the world. Australia’s plain packaging legislation is being challenged at the WTO. Last week UK charity the British Heart Foundation said a cross-country survey it carried out showed that only a third of UK teenagers are deterred from smoking by current cigarette packs, compared to almost half in Australia, where packs are almost entirely covered by graphic warnings.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Earlier this month, Managing IP had exclusively reported that the French arm of Taylor Wessing was minded to pull out of the deal
Our latest podcast examines how Weil’s IP practice evolved, where its practitioners could (and will) go next, and which firms and markets stand to benefit from the redistribution of talent
Former Latham partner Chris Henry and transactions lawyer Liza Cotter are heading to the firm as Weil’s IP practice starts to disperse
Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
Gift this article