EU Court says no to Italy and Spain and yes to unitary patent plan

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU Court says no to Italy and Spain and yes to unitary patent plan

Italy and Spain have failed to persuade the Court of Justice of the EU to prevent other member states from going ahead with the unitary patent

The two countries had complained to Europe’s top court over the European Council’s 2011 decision to use the so-called enhanced procedure to allow the remaining 25 member states to agree a deal between themselves on a single European patent.

Italy and Spain have long been opposed to the unitary patent on language grounds, complaining that plans to use English, French and German as the new patent’s official languages discriminates against Spanish and Italian speakers.

But today the Court ruled that it was acceptable for the European Council to use the enhanced cooperation procedure after efforts to achieve agreement from each of the EU’s 27 member states had failed.

Although the Court acknowledged that it would be unacceptable for the Council to use the enhanced procedure whenever member states failed to reach agreement on an issue, it said that in this case, the Council had carefully and impartially ascertained whether the condition of “last resort” had been met. In particular, the Court noted that negotiations on the unitary patent began in 2000 and that a range of language arrangements had been discussed by member states.

The judges also rejected Spain and Italy’s arguments that the decision by the other 25 states to press ahead with a unitary patent without them would damage the internal market or the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the EU.

Spain is believed to have filed another case at the CJEU challenging the patent plans on other grounds, though details of this complaint are not yet available.

Today's decision means the unitary patent and unified patent court (UPC) plans are on track. The new system is expected to come into effect in 2015, once the UPC agreement has been ratified by at least 13 member states.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Sharad Vadehra of Kan & Krishme discusses why older IP firms still have an edge over up-and-coming boutiques and how the firm is using AI to provide quick and cost-effective service
Lawyers at Appleyard Lees share how they picked apart a plant breeder’s infringement claims concerning the ‘Tango’ mandarin
A further decision on long-arm status, and a new hire for Pentarc in Germany from Taylor Wessing were also among top developments
The US decision marks a rare grant of a request under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act in a patent case
Stobbs has applied to strike out a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
With trademark volumes surging, trademark teams need to think beyond traditional clearance searches, towards a continuous, intelligence-led workflow, says Meghan Medeiros of Corsearch
Brazilian in-house counsel say law firms’ technology investments have not translated into tangible benefits, meaning tech use is a minor factor when selecting advisers
A lack of comfort among some salaried partners shows why law firms must actively foster inclusion, not merely focus on diversity mandates
Arrival of Laura Alonso, alongside a team of 11, will bring ‘significant value’ to ECIJA clients, says CEO
In the first of a two-part article, lawyers at Spruson & Ferguson and Marshall Gerstein provide an overview of China’s system for appealing against patent invalidation decisions
Gift this article