From the AIPLA President
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

From the AIPLA President

lewis-aipla.jpg

Since this is my first blog post as AIPLA President (or ever!), I thought I would give a brief preview of the upcoming year, and what you can expect from this blog

aiplalogospelled.jpg

lewisjeff200.jpg

pbwt-stack-2line-280.jpg

As President of the American Intellectual Property Law Association, I will have a broad range of responsibilities and deal with a wide variety of IP issues on a regular basis. My hope is that by providing insight and access to the office of the AIPLA President, this blog will convey some of that in a manner that is informative and interesting. Though I must admit that the concept of providing content that people are actually interested in reading on a regular basis is a bit scary to me. But, as they say, nothing ventured, nothing gained, so I invite you to join me for what promises to be an interesting year in the world of IP. Presumably, many of you are familiar with AIPLA. But for those of you who are not, let me simply repeat what a German colleague of mine once said – being President of AIPLA makes you the voice of the largest IP community in the world, responsible for real economic interests, namely, people’s jobs, as well as innovation.

So let’s dive right in. The week leading up to my presidency was pretty full. My practice at Patterson Belknap Webb & Tylerfocuses on patent litigation, and so on Monday and Tuesday, October 22 and 23, I served as faculty for a National Institute for Trial Advocacyprogram sponsored by the Federal Circuit Bar Associationin Washington, DC.

But, come Wednesday October 24 th , the AIPLA Annual Meeting at which I would be installed as AIPLA President, had arrived. After the annual meeting I returned to New York and, of course, Superstorm Sandy arrived on the East Coast, which delayed this initial blog post.

This blog being delayed was the least important inconvenience from the storm, and I hope that those of you who were impacted were also merely inconvenienced, and nothing worse.

Over the next year I hope to write about the various advocacy work that AIPLA is doing in the courts, relevant governmental agencies, and legislatures (federal and state); discuss foreign trips to promote American IP interests; and share thoughts about my visits around the country with members and at IP events (please let me know if there's a specific event that I should consider attending, as I’m always looking for suggestions). I hope to meet many of you on these travels.

Thanks for reading and I look forward to an exciting year.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

High-earning businesses place most value on the depth of the external legal teams advising them, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Kilpatrick Townsend was recognised as Americas firm of the year, while patent powerhouse James Haley won a lifetime achievement award
Partners at Foley Hoag and Kilburn & Strode explore how US and UK courts have addressed questions of AI and inventorship
In-house lawyers have considerable influence over law firms’ actions, so they must use that power to push their external advisers to adopt sustainable practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Counsel say they’re advising clients to keep a close eye on confidentiality agreements after the FTC voted to ban non-competes
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows US firms making major swoops for IP teams, while South Korea has also been a buoyant market
The finalists for the 13th annual awards have been announced
Counsel reveal how a proposal to create separate briefings for discretionary denials at the USPTO could affect their PTAB strategies
The UK Supreme Court rejected the firm’s appeal against an earlier ruling because it did not raise an arguable point of law
Gift this article