US court cracks down on trade mark registry scammers

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

US court cracks down on trade mark registry scammers

A New York court has handed down a first-of-its-kind judgment against a company which charged trade mark owners nearly $1,000 for inclusion in a so-called catalogue of registered US trade marks

The complaint, which was filed by Leason Ellis, alleged that the business, USA Trademark Enterprises, and its principals, Timea Csikos and Andras Nemeth, engaged in false advertising and unfair competition. It claimed the company sent unsolicited notices designed to look like official government correspondence, and that the catalogue offered no commercial value because the information it published is freely available in the USPTO’s online records.

USA Trademark Enterprises denied any wrongdoing or liability, but the mutual consent judgment, which was entered on June 14 by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, banned it from publishing the catalogue again or engaging in IP-related activities in the US. It also required the Florida company to pay $10,000 to the firm.

Leason Ellis partner Martin Schwimmer described the scheme as part of “a chronic problem” which has become more prevalent in the US since the USPTO’s trade mark database became available online. The firm, which owns the trade mark Leason Ellis, filed the suit in January after receiving an unsolicited notice from USA Trademark Enterprises.

“I have seen this the entire time I have been a practising trade mark lawyer,” said Schwimmer. “It’s disturbing to see unsophisticated trade mark owners targeted by these individuals, so we contributed our part in putting one operation out of business. We would like to turn the tide.”

In a recent interview, USPTO commissioner for trademarks Deborah Cohn told Managing IP the Office has been monitoring the uptick in fake solicitations and sent a cease and desist letter to at least one company.

Schwimmer described USA Trademark’s targets as, “broadly speaking, not represented by sophisticated trade mark counsel. These would be smaller businesses – people who really can’t afford to pay out $1,000 for no return. There were a lot of non-profits”.

Leason Ellis plans to donate the $10,000 granted by the judgment to the USPTO to help fund programmes alerting trade mark owners to the issue. USPTO spokesman Patrick Ross confirmed that the organisation has received legal clearance to accept the donation.

He added that the USPTO is engaged in “ongoing education efforts on this critical problem”, including media campaigns, talking to business groups, and including a printed warning notice with every trade mark registration certificate that is sent out.

The former website of US Trademark Enterprises now appears to have been taken down, and emails to the company were returned as undeliverable. Its attorney, Andrew Cove of Florida firm Cove & Associates, did not immediately respond to a request for a comment.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
Gift this article