AIPPI report recommends overhaul

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

AIPPI report recommends overhaul

A frank report commissioned by the industry association says AIPPI has “stalled” and needs urgent reform if it is to remain relevant

The report by Robin Rolfe Resources (RRR) tells AIPPI its organisation is too “large and bulky”, that it needs to hire more permanent staff, and that it will only maintain its status if it becomes more of a lobbying body – pushing for the IP harmonisation its resolutions recommend.

AIPPI commissioned the report last year and it was released on the association’s website on Monday. It is not easy to find, however, illustrating some of the criticism of the site contained in the report.

The report, which was based on several surveys by RRR as well as telephone interviews and comparative studies, is described by incoming AIPPI President John Bochnovic as “direct and dramatic, given what we are used to in this organisation”.

John Bochnovic AIPPI

John Bochnovic

But he said it reflects a “real appetite for change”. “It gives us a great platform to make decisions at the Congress in Seoul next month. Given the report and its emphasis on urgency and boldness, we will have failed if we can’t agree something there,” said Bochnovic, who is due to be elected president during the Seoul Congress.

Some of the changes can be implemented “almost immediately”, such as changes to the presentation of information. Others, such as reforming management, may take amendment to the statutes. That could theoretically waiting until the next Congress, in Toronto in 2014.

“There are ways to work around that, though they’re not easy,” said Bochnovic. “I want to get this going much faster than that though – and some things could be voted on remotely even before the Forum at Helsinki in 2013.”

Among the Report’s recommendations are that:

- AIPPI must become more influential and exhibit leadership. It must try to make its ideas on harmonisation a reality - The national groups have too much control. AIPPI must become centralised - The management structure is “unnecessarily complicated” with two “essentially identical decision-making bodies”. The executive committee, council of presidents and bureau must be given separate roles - The association needs more permanent staff - Joint ventures with academia and industry-specific committees should be established to help fill holes with those two groups - Advertising and other sources of revenue should be considered - Communications need to be more editorial and reports edited by a native English speaker - More than four questions must be addressed at every Congress - The Congress meetings should be annual and planning for them should be taken away from the group in the host country

Bochnovic says that Rio de Janeiro, which is scheduled to hold a Forum and Executive Committee meeting in 2015, could be transformed into a Congress. He also recognises that destinations such as Cancun – planned for 2018 – can be hard for attendees to justify.

Said Bochnovic: “This is definitely something we needed. We may be ‘too old, too white and too male’, as Robin quotes a respondent saying in her Report, but we are not too old to change.”

The Report will be discussed in detail at the AIPPI Congress in Seoul next month.

Managing IP will be publishing the AIPPI Congress News during the meeting in print and online , with news and reports from Seoul, including an extended interview with Bochnovic.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Gift this article