Kobe Bryant fights for Chinese trade mark

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Kobe Bryant fights for Chinese trade mark

First it was Michael Jordan. Now Kobe Bryant is the latest American basketball player to go to court over naming rights in China

China’s Ministry of Commerce reports that the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (TRAB) has denied Nike’s opposition to a Chinese individual from Fujian province who registered the name of Los Angeles Lakers star Kobe Bryant. He has registered “KB-Bryant” and the Chinese alliteration for Kobe (科比) in class 18, which covers items such as handbags and wallets.

Kobe_Bryant

The TRAB found that Nike, who has an endorsement deal with Bryant, failed to show that Bryant was well known in fields other than basketball and that the trade marks did not infringe upon Nike’s marks.

Nike has appealed the TRAB’s ruling to the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court.

The National Basketball Association is extremely popular in China, and a number of NBA stars have had to fight against unaffiliated Chinese companies using their names.

Yao Ming, the league’s first player from China, had to deal with companies using his name to sell beer and steel pipes. Michael Jordan has filed a lawsuit against Qiaodan Sportswear, which registered the Chinese version of his name, “乔丹” (“Qiaodan”). Recently, Jeremy Lin discovered that the owner of Wuxi Risheng Sporting Goods registered the somewhat cumbersome “Jeremy S.H.L. 林书豪”mark in 2011, nearly a year before Lin’s sudden rise to fame.





more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

An AI platform being sold for £40m, and lateral hires involving law firms Womble Bond Dickinson and Cadwell Thomas were among the top talking points
With the London Annual Meeting behind us, we look back at some of the lessons learned this week and ahead to what 2027 will bring
In-house counsel aren’t impressed with law firms’ international networks, but practitioners say they are crucial for business
Publication of the UPC’s annual report and adoption of the procedural rules of the Patent Mediation and Arbitration Centre were also among major developments
With the INTA Annual Meeting drawing to a close, we asked attendees for their top tips on how to close business after a meeting
Senior UK judges discussing the impact of AI on the judiciary, and the role of in-house IP lawyers during corporate transactions and carve-outs were among the top talking points
Tarun Khurana, founding partner of Khurana & Khurana, discusses juggling tasks, why every hour has a value, and the importance of ‘trusting the process’
Annual Meeting hears that IP firms are targeting hires with technical literacy in a fragmented landscape, and that those that build an online presence will distinguish themselves from the digital chaos
How law firms can secure themselves in a technology-driven IP landscape and how IP teams can develop future leadership were among the top talking points
The variety of winners demonstrates that the UPC is now a core benchmark rather than an experimental consideration, while junior lawyers are becoming more deeply involved in key work
Gift this article