Randall Rader: Defender of the patent system

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Randall Rader: Defender of the patent system

The chief judge of the US patent court says the economy depends on patents

rader-randall.jpg

Professor, author, rock star

Professor, author and sometime rock star, to the patent bar Randall Rader is primarily chief judge of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit – the country's authoritative voice (second, that is, to the Supreme Court) on all things patents. In recent years, the Federal Circuit has presided over feuds on breast cancer gene patents (The Association for Molecular Pathology v the USPTO) and the patent eligibility of diagnostic method claims (Prometheus v Mayo), and is due to issue opinions on joint infringement (Akamai Technologies v Limelight Networks and McKesson Technologies v Epic Systems Corp) this year.


"Innovation is still the key to our recovery, our economy depends on patents"


Born in 1949 in Hastings, Nebraska, Rader studied English at Brigham Young University before earning his law degree at The George Washington University Law School. In 1990, George HW Bush appointed him to the patent court, where he rose to the top job in 2010 upon chief judge Paul Michel's retirement. An avid professor of intellectual property, Rader has taught at his alma mater as well as the University of Virginia School of Law, Munich Intellectual Property Law Center, Georgetown University Law Center, and universities in Beijing and Tokyo.

A staunch defender of the patent system, Rader believes the creation of the Federal Circuit helped lift the US economy from the recession of the early 1980s to its heydays in the 1990s. "That story has some modern application; innovation is still the key to our recovery, our economy depends on patents," Rader once told Managing IP. "Renewed commitment to the principles of innovation can give us the same result again."

Further reading:

Prometheus reiterates broad patent eligibility standard

Lawyers react to Myriad decision

Interview: Randall Rader on the CAFC’s history

Judge Rader defends the patent system

Go to:

Top 50 homepage

Asia Top 50

Americas Top 50

Europe Top 50


more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article