Randall Rader: Defender of the patent system

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Randall Rader: Defender of the patent system

The chief judge of the US patent court says the economy depends on patents

rader-randall.jpg

Professor, author, rock star

Professor, author and sometime rock star, to the patent bar Randall Rader is primarily chief judge of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit – the country's authoritative voice (second, that is, to the Supreme Court) on all things patents. In recent years, the Federal Circuit has presided over feuds on breast cancer gene patents (The Association for Molecular Pathology v the USPTO) and the patent eligibility of diagnostic method claims (Prometheus v Mayo), and is due to issue opinions on joint infringement (Akamai Technologies v Limelight Networks and McKesson Technologies v Epic Systems Corp) this year.


"Innovation is still the key to our recovery, our economy depends on patents"


Born in 1949 in Hastings, Nebraska, Rader studied English at Brigham Young University before earning his law degree at The George Washington University Law School. In 1990, George HW Bush appointed him to the patent court, where he rose to the top job in 2010 upon chief judge Paul Michel's retirement. An avid professor of intellectual property, Rader has taught at his alma mater as well as the University of Virginia School of Law, Munich Intellectual Property Law Center, Georgetown University Law Center, and universities in Beijing and Tokyo.

A staunch defender of the patent system, Rader believes the creation of the Federal Circuit helped lift the US economy from the recession of the early 1980s to its heydays in the 1990s. "That story has some modern application; innovation is still the key to our recovery, our economy depends on patents," Rader once told Managing IP. "Renewed commitment to the principles of innovation can give us the same result again."

Further reading:

Prometheus reiterates broad patent eligibility standard

Lawyers react to Myriad decision

Interview: Randall Rader on the CAFC’s history

Judge Rader defends the patent system

Go to:

Top 50 homepage

Asia Top 50

Americas Top 50

Europe Top 50


more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
The court ruled against the owner of the ‘Umbro’ mark, despite noting that post-sale confusion can be a legitimate ground for infringement
Shem Otanga discusses the importance of curiosity and passion, and why he would have loved to have been a professional recording artist
Practitioners say the Bombay High Court shouldn’t have refused well-known trademark recognition for TikTok simply because the app is banned in India
In-house counsel explain why firms should provide risk management advice that helps them achieve their goals
Attorneys at four firms explain the AI trends they expect in the future, including a potential shift in who plaintiffs sue for copyright infringement
The dispute at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court pits Dryrobe against D-Robe and will include a ‘genericide’ element
Gift this article