IP filings surge ahead of economic growth

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

IP filings surge ahead of economic growth

Patent and trade mark filings rose 7.2% and 11.8% respectively in 2010, far ahead of global GDP growth at 5.1%, according to WIPO’s annual statistics report

Much of this increase is due to China, whose patent applications rose 24.3% and trade mark applications 29.8%. Without China, the rise in patent numbers almost halves to 3.7%.

But the recovery from 2009 is still impressive – using the same ex-China model, patent filings fell almost 6% that year. “The strength of IP growth around the world was unexpected given the still stuttering economy,” said senior WIPO statistical analyst Mosahid Khan.

"We were particularly surprised at how strong the US patent recovery was, given the difficulties of its economy.” Patent applications did not grow at all in the US in 2009, but rose 7.5% in 2010.

WIPO has made an effort to be more up to date with its statistics this year. The World IP Indicators report for 2008 came out in September 2010. By moving a little later to December in 2011, the Office has managed to jump a year ahead and report on 2010 numbers.

Worldwide patent filings growth rate (%)

2007

2008

2009

2010

With China

4

2.7

-3.6

7.2

Without China

2.4

0.3

-5.8

3.7

WIPO has gone to greater lengths to generate statistics in other areas, including on patent pendency times. According to Khan, this is one reason that the WIPO report says that pendency times have increased in recent years, but the number of pending applications has declined. While the latter information came from IP offices, WIPO generated the former post-grant, by looking at granted patents and then searching back to when the application was made.

It is also worth noting that the figure for pending patent applications does not include China, which doesn’t publish this information. In recent years, SIPO has been granting patents at a slower rate than the US and Japan. Those two offices accounted for 80% of the growth in the number of granted patents in 2010.

Among other results from the report, Japan’s patent filing continued to shrink in 2010, though at a lesser rate than in 2009. Khan points out that there are many dynamics at work here, including an increasing use of the PCT system by Japanese patent applicants and an increase in the number of claims per patent.

WIPO receives some information from 88 IP offices for patents, out of a possible 135, and 115 for trade marks out of 169. Those missing offices are among the smallest though, giving data coverage of 97% and 87% respectively.

The full report can be seen here.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Rebekah Gay discusses overcoming self-doubt, supporting the next generation of women lawyers, and how changing client demands are reshaping IP practice
New filing data suggests Germany's grip on UPC litigation remains strong, while Bardehle Pagenberg, Arnold Ruess, Hogan Lovells and Carpmaels notch up notable cases
In 27 years, KASS has expanded to seven countries in southeast Asia and is now eyeing further growth opportunities. Its CEO shares her perspective
Mine Güner discusses bridging law and business, taking the initiative, and why Taylor Swift helped put copyright on the map
Cindy Goh discusses why she launched Cheang & Ariff's IP department, the improving litigation environment in Malaysia and what to consider when using AI
Increased focus on adding patent litigation depth to the firm’s Dallas office was behind the boutique’s most recent hires
IPH's Canadian acquisitions are paying off on paper, but a couple of strong years may not be enough to show that the group's strategy has truly won over the market
Examiner statistics could help patent prosecution practitioners tailor strategies, turning an area of high variability into a potential competitive advantage
The England and Wales High Court’s ruling in Accord v Novartis may not rewrite the law on plausibility, but it does signal a pragmatic approach that could provide greater certainty for life sciences innovators
Firms with established sports relationships and specialised expertise are well positioned to capture the market’s expanded pool of IP work
Gift this article