This content is from: Copyright
How will US Supreme Court define “full costs” in copyright cases?
In Rimini Street v Oracle, the definition of “full costs” awarded to prevailing parties by the Copyright Act is disputed. IP practitioners weigh in on whether the court will decide it includes only taxable costs or non-taxable costs as well
To access our in-house intelligence please request a trial here.
Read this article – and more – for a 30 day period.
REQUEST ACCESSAre you already an Managing IP subscriber? Login here