This content is from: Copyright

How will US Supreme Court define “full costs” in copyright cases?

In Rimini Street v Oracle, the definition of “full costs” awarded to prevailing parties by the Copyright Act is disputed. IP practitioners weigh in on whether the court will decide it includes only taxable costs or non-taxable costs as well

Get Free Access to read more …

To read the full article, activate your free trial.

Get Free Access
  • Unlimited articles for one week
  • No commitments; no payment details required
  • Featuring IP strategy, copyright, patents, trademark and more!

Are you a Managing IP subscriber? Simply login here.

Related