France: Law on national domain images changes

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

France: Law on national domain images changes

Sponsored by

beau-de-lomenie.png

A French court issued a ruling on April 13 2018 concerning the photographs of Chambord Castle used by Kronenbourg breweries in the context of an advertising campaign for one of their beers.

The case asked whether the castle, which is part of the public domain of the French state, can be reproduced without financial compensation or authorisation from the public institution.

Previously, commercial exploitation of a photograph of a private building has been allowed, without prior authorisation or any financial compensation, unless the photo caused abnormal disturbance to the owner of the building or if the owner had copyright on that building.

The court confirmed this ruling and rejected the argument that such commercial operation could be considered as private use of the public domain. Deciding differently would restrain the freedom of entrepreneurship.

This decision was, however, made prior to Law No. 2016-925 of July 7 2016 on the freedom of creation, architecture and heritage.

Now a specific system is set up for image rights of goods falling under the category of "national domain". A first list of six monuments and estates was submitted by the Ministry of Culture and Communication and validated by the Historical Monuments National Commission. On this list were the Chambord Estate, the Castle of Angers, the Palais du Rhin in Strasburg, the Estate of Pau, the Louvre and Tuileries Estates in Paris (1st) and the Palais de l'Elysée in Paris (8th).

Article L. 621-42 of the Heritage Code means that prior authorisation and potential financial compensation are now the rule for using an image of such buildings.

However, such authorisation is not required when the image also pursues a cultural, educational, research or information purpose or is linked to a public service task.

A decree should provide details about the concept of "commercial purpose".

marie.jpg

Aurélia Marie


Cabinet Beau de Loménie

158, rue de l’Université

F - 75340 Paris Cedex 07 France

Tel: +33 1 44 18 89 00

Fax: +33 1 44 18 04 23

contact@bdl-ip.com

www.bdl-ip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

François Pochart, Grégoire Desrousseaux and Lionel Martin, long-standing figures in the firm’s patent litigation team, are set to help launch a Paris-based litigation offering
The Unitary Patent has passed 100,000 registrations, but new data raises the question of whether 30% uptake is a ceiling or a staging post for further growth, say Michael Nielsen and Darren Smyth of EIP and Andrew Samm at Patently
The new generation of in-house IP leaders want commercial judgment, accessibility and flexibility, with AI raising expectations around both fees and delivery
The firm launched a San Diego office earlier this month, but California investment and expansion is far from complete
The industry’s response to AI requires an unfamiliar ingredient as firms battle to shape their futures
The firm is looking beyond replacing recently departed talent, betting instead on senior leaders to strengthen and expand its patent litigation platform
Olga Partington, director in Sterne Kessler’s biotechnology and chemical practice group, shares why a patent's vulnerability peaks when it is young, rather than when it is most valuable, under the PTAB's new framework
IP experts gathered in San Francisco last week to discuss the changing global SEP landscape and new licensing models for AI infrastructure
SKW Schwarz partner Daniel Kendziur explains how new green claims rules are changing his workload and bringing him into direct contact with marketing, PR and government affairs teams
The government is targeting earlier resolution of SEP disputes while ruling out a standalone IPEC rate determination track and restrictions on injunctions
Gift this article