European designs: The CJEU gives its interpretation of the “repair clause”

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

European designs: The CJEU gives its interpretation of the “repair clause”

Sponsored by

beau-de-lomenie.png

The question of the protection of spare parts by designs has always been controversial.

Article 110 §1, i.e. the "repair clause", of Council Regulation (EC) n°6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs, excludes from protection as European design, component parts of a complex product, used to repair this product, to give it back its initial appearance.

On December 20 2017, the CJUE decided on article 110 §1 in respect of the manufacture and the commercialization by of wheel rims protected by European designs. The defendant, sued for infringement, asserted under article 110 §1, that no protection regarding those designs could be opposed against him. (Audi and Porsche joined cases C-397/16 and C-435/16)

For the Court, the shape of those parts does not need to be prescribed by the appearance of the complex product appearance they belong to.

Then parts such as wheel rims are concerned by article 110 §1 even if they can vary, depending on types and options available on a same vehicle.

These parts must be components, that can be replaced in order to allow the disassembly and reassembly of one product, and without which it could not be used normally.

They must be used for repairing a product that has become defective, and not for "pleasure or simple convenience".

The "repair clause" applies only to parts of a complex product, visually identical to the original parts. If this condition of identity is not met, the exclusive right of the design's owner may be infringed.

Finally, the Court suggests imposing a duty of information that manufacturers or sellers are not the owners of the designs and that the parts can only be used for repairing, to give back the original appearance of the product.

Aurélia Marie


Cabinet Beau de Loménie

158, rue de l’Université

F - 75340 Paris Cedex 07 France

Tel: +33 1 44 18 89 00

Fax: +33 1 44 18 04 23

contact@bdl-ip.com

www.bdl-ip.com


more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
Gift this article