The Federal Circuit has granted Micron’s mandamus petition stating: “We conclude that TC Heartland changed the controlling law in the relevant sense: at the time of the initial motion to dismiss, before the Court decided TC Heartland, the venue defense … based on TC Heartland’s interpretation of the venue statute was not ‘available’”
Unlock this content.
The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.
The model covers court-guided settlements, submissions-led determination of infringement and validity issues, and leeway for the court to determine a FRAND rate during negotiations
News of Health Hoglund joining Sisvel and the Delhi High Court staying a $2.2 million decree in favour of Philips were also among the top talking points
Pantech counsel Shogo Matsunaga speaks exclusively to Managing IP about how his team proved Google’s unwillingness, and ultimately secured a landmark SEP settlement
Chunguang Hu of China PAT explains why his ‘insider’ experience as a patent examiner benefits clients and why he wants to debunk the myth that IP has limited value in China
January 08 2026
Gift this article
As a premium subscriber, you can gift this article for free
https://www.demo.com/demo-article/
Link copied to clipboard
You have reached the limit for gifting for this month
There was an error processing the request. Please try again later.