United Kingdom: Implications of Brexit for IP rights

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

United Kingdom: Implications of Brexit for IP rights

On March 29, Prime Minister Theresa May triggered Article 50, formally notifying the European Union of the UK's intention to withdraw from the EU. The UK government now begins the lengthy process of negotiating the terms of our exit with our European partners.

Initially, there will be no change as the UK will remain an EU member until the process has been completed, which is estimated to be at least two years, possibly considerably longer.

Brexit will have no effect on the usual system for European patents. In terms of IP it is important to differentiate the terms EU and Europe. European patents cover territories which are different to the member states of the EU. The UK will continue to be a member of the European Patent Organisation which is a separate body from the EU. UK patent protection will continue to be available via the European Patent Office and UK-based qualified European patent attorneys will act in the usual way in all matters before the EPO.

In the case of European Union trade marks (EUTMs) and registered Community designs (RCDs), nothing will change until the leaving process is complete, so the impact of Brexit will depend on the outcome of the negotiations. Until that point, EUTMs and RCDs remain in force and cover the UK. We fully expect that EUTM holders will not lose their UK rights, and are monitoring this situation. Organisations should review their EUTM portfolio to identify those trade marks of most value to their UK business and consider re-filing in the UK if they identify that the present EU/UK negotiated outcome may present a risk to their trade mark rights. National UK IP rights, including trade marks and designs, will, of course, be unaffected by Brexit.

Also, IP agreements with other parties should be checked for any potential implications in light of the UK exit.

The UK is to remain part of the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court system. The UK Intellectual Property Office has confirmed that the government's preparations for ratification of the UPC Agreement are "fully on track" to allow the UK-based UPC to open in December 2017 as per the preparatory committee's timetable.

Chapman

Helga Chapman

Chapman + Co

Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys

Chapman IP, Kings Park House, 22 Kings Park Road

Southampton SO15 2AT, UK

Tel: +44 (0) 23 8000 2022 

info@chapmanip.com  

www.chapmanip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Peter Ling of Lenz & Staehelin in Zurich discusses trends in patent litigation, the regulation of AI and the benefits of teaching IP
Brandsmiths and Powell Gilbert will contest claims over several UK trademarks in a High Court case examining the ownership and revival of a heritage brand
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is taking a fresh strategic approach to pricing in its AI strategy. It could amplify calls for law firms to ditch the billable hour
Charles Harding plans to build a new team around life sciences oppositions and contentious work, drawing on his three decades developing a practice from scratch at D Young & Co
The firm reveals how its litigation strategies informed the arguments that took Masimo’s judgment past $818 million
The firm was rebuilding its IP practice through a string of patent hires and a Texas expansion, but its dissolution has put the newly built talent back into the market
Gift this article