United Kingdom: Implications of Brexit for IP rights

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

United Kingdom: Implications of Brexit for IP rights

On March 29, Prime Minister Theresa May triggered Article 50, formally notifying the European Union of the UK's intention to withdraw from the EU. The UK government now begins the lengthy process of negotiating the terms of our exit with our European partners.

Initially, there will be no change as the UK will remain an EU member until the process has been completed, which is estimated to be at least two years, possibly considerably longer.

Brexit will have no effect on the usual system for European patents. In terms of IP it is important to differentiate the terms EU and Europe. European patents cover territories which are different to the member states of the EU. The UK will continue to be a member of the European Patent Organisation which is a separate body from the EU. UK patent protection will continue to be available via the European Patent Office and UK-based qualified European patent attorneys will act in the usual way in all matters before the EPO.

In the case of European Union trade marks (EUTMs) and registered Community designs (RCDs), nothing will change until the leaving process is complete, so the impact of Brexit will depend on the outcome of the negotiations. Until that point, EUTMs and RCDs remain in force and cover the UK. We fully expect that EUTM holders will not lose their UK rights, and are monitoring this situation. Organisations should review their EUTM portfolio to identify those trade marks of most value to their UK business and consider re-filing in the UK if they identify that the present EU/UK negotiated outcome may present a risk to their trade mark rights. National UK IP rights, including trade marks and designs, will, of course, be unaffected by Brexit.

Also, IP agreements with other parties should be checked for any potential implications in light of the UK exit.

The UK is to remain part of the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court system. The UK Intellectual Property Office has confirmed that the government's preparations for ratification of the UPC Agreement are "fully on track" to allow the UK-based UPC to open in December 2017 as per the preparatory committee's timetable.

Chapman

Helga Chapman

Chapman + Co

Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys

Chapman IP, Kings Park House, 22 Kings Park Road

Southampton SO15 2AT, UK

Tel: +44 (0) 23 8000 2022 

info@chapmanip.com  

www.chapmanip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm’s involvement in prominent AI cases drew litigator Christian Mammen to join from Womble Bond Dickinson, as US firms continue to bolster AI-focused practices
Two judicial appointments confirmed in Paris and Mannheim, while cross-border injunctions and high-profile procedural rulings keep major patent practices occupied
Patent and trademark practitioners say arrival of barrister will help maintain the UK's reputation as a leading forum for complex IP disputes
Qantm CEO speaks to Managing IP about the business's first deal since it was acquired by a private equity firm and explains why top-tier Malaysian firm Henry Goh & Co was the group's ‘plan A, B and C’
György Pintz, founder of Pintz & Partners, talks through the challenges of founding a firm and explains why lawyers and table tennis players have more in common than you might expect
Kate Nuehring Su, partner at Marshall, Gerstein & Borun, explores a successful PTAB appeal and why the Federal Circuit reached an opposite outcome on the same doctrine
From BTS to Squid Game and kimchi to memory chips, the Korean wave is reverberating around the world and IP work is also seeing a boom, say two Yoon & Yang partners
Managing IP will host a ceremony in Kuala Lumpur on November 5 to reveal the winners
Recent lateral moves raise a bigger question for full-service firms – can patent litigation remain a strategic priority when competing practices generate larger profits?
As counterfeiters grow increasingly sophisticated, Gibson Dunn is differentiating its trademark practice through a focus on payment tracing, judgment enforcement and asset recovery
Gift this article