United Kingdom: A matter of opinion

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

United Kingdom: A matter of opinion

The UKIPO has long provided the means for any third party to obtain an independent opinion on questions of validity and infringement in relation to granted UK and EP(UK) patents. More recently this service has been extended, for example by allowing additional grounds of invalidity to be raised, leading to a surge in its popularity among clients operating in the UK.

Any person may request the UKIPO to provide an opinion on validity or infringement of a UK or EP(UK) patent. However, opinions are typically requested by a patent holder, an exclusive licensee of the patent or a third party for whom a patent poses an infringement risk.

When filing any request for an opinion, it is essential to set out the evidence and arguments that support your position. For example, when arguing for invalidity, any request for an opinion should include detailed reasoning in relation to each ground of invalidity raised while highlighting relevant prior art documents. Alternatively, when arguing for an opinion of infringement, it is important to set out the facts relating to any potentially infringing products and acts.

While any opinion issued is non-binding, the position of the UKIPO may assist in formulating an overall commercial strategy surrounding the patent right in question, and strengthen a position in mediation. Additionally, the opinion system offers a further advantage in that a finding of patent claim invalidity may cause the UKIPO to begin the process of revocation in the UK. This process is only undertaken on patents the UKIPO deem to be clearly invalid.

The UKIPO may begin revocation proceedings in relation to both UK and EP(UK) patents. In the case of EP(UK) patents, such revocation proceedings will only affect the UK and will not be Europe wide.

Overall, the opinions service offered by the UKIPO is a useful commercial tool, offering a means of obtaining an independent opinion as to any aspect of patent validity or infringement. Additionally, in the clearest cases of invalidity, the UKIPO opinion service is an attractive option where rapid, cost-effective revocation of a competitor's patent is desired.

Chapman

Helga Chapman

Chapman + Co

Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys

Chapman IP, Kings Park House, 22 Kings Park Road

Southampton SO15 2AT, UK

Tel: +44 (0) 23 8000 2022 

info@chapmanip.com  

www.chapmanip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Tilleke & Gibbins topped the leaderboard with four awards across the region, while Anand & Anand and Kim & Chang emerged as outstanding domestic firms
News of a new addition to Via LA’s Qi wireless charging patent pool, and potential fee increases at the UKIPO were also among the top talking points
The keenly awaited ruling should act as a ‘call to arms’ for a much-needed evolution of UK copyright law, says Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard
Lawyers at Lavoix provide an overview of the UPC’s approach to inventive step and whether the forum is promoting its own approach rather than following the EPO
Andrew Blattman, who helped IPH gain significant ground in Asia and Canada, will leave in the second half of 2026
The court ordering a complainant to rank its arguments in order of potential success and a win for Edwards Lifesciences were among the top developments in recent weeks
Frederick Lee has rejoined Boies Schiller Flexner, bolstering the firm’s capabilities across AI, media, and entertainment
Nirav Desai and Sasha S Rao at Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox explore how companies’ efforts to manage tariffs by altering corporate structures can undermine their ability to assert their patents and recover damages
Monika Żuraw, founder of Żuraw & Partners, discusses why IP should be part of the foundation of a business, and taking on projects that others walk away from
Lawyers say attention will turn to the UK government’s AI consultation after judgment fails to match pre-trial hype
Gift this article