Brexit and IP: The UK IPO’s views

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brexit and IP: The UK IPO’s views

Brexit-168.

The UK Intellectual Property Office has confirmed the legal status of three EU-related IP rights in effect in the UK and the government’s next steps for these rights ahead of Brexit. It remains unknown if the UK will ratify the UPC Agreement

Brexit-168.

In its guide titled ‘IP and Brexit: The facts’ the UK IPO singled out four rights: EU trade marks (EUTM), registered Community designs (RCD), copyright and European patents designating the UK. In summary, and as we noted in our ‘Brexit and IP: A Primer’, the IPO says while the UK remains an EU member there will be no change in legal terms to the first three rights. The European patent system administered by the European Patent Office is outside the EU so Brexit has no impact.

 

Trade marks and designs

The post-Brexit regimes for EUTM and RCD seem to worry owners and practitioners the most, as we recently found out. The IPO says the “government is exploring various options [for their validity in the UK] and we will be consulting users of the system about the best way forward”. For those concerned about future right of representation before the EU Intellectual Property Office, the IPO added: “We welcome views on how to address these concerns and are involving stakeholders in consideration of these issues.”

Copyright

The European Commission intends to further harmonise copyright rules in the EU (the Digital Single Market), and just last month UK law came into force to extend the term of copyright protection for industrially manufactured artistic works. On copyright, the IPO said: “While the UK remains in the EU, our copyright laws will continue to comply with the EU copyright directives, and we will continue to participate in EU negotiations. The continued effect of EU Directives and Regulations following our exit from the EU will depend on the terms of our future relationship.”

Unified Patent Court

It seems we will have to wait until next year to know the UK government’s decision on UPC Agreement ratification. The IPO did not say anything on this, but it noted: “The UK remains a Contracting Member State of the Unified Patent Court at present. We will continue to attend and participate in UPC meetings in that capacity. There will be no immediate changes.”

‘IP and Brexit: The facts’ can be accessed here.

Follow our coverage of Brexit and IP at www.managingip.com/Brexit and the Unitary Patent and UPC at www.managingip.com/upc.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

As global commerce continues to expand through e-commerce platforms and digital marketplaces, protecting brands has become a growing challenge for organisations worldwide. Counterfeiting, intellectual property infringement, and online brand abuse are increasing across industries, making brand protection strategies a critical priority for businesses.
Henrik Holzapfel and Chuck Larsen of McDermott Will & Schulte explain why a Court of Appeal ruling could promote access to justice and present a growth opportunity for litigation finance
A co-partner in charge says the UK prosecution teams are a ‘vital’ part of the firm’s offering, while praising a key injunction win
A team from White & Case has checked in on behalf of Premier Inn Hotels in a UK trademark and passing off case against a cookie brand
Litigation team says pre-trial work and a Section 101 defence helped significantly limit damages payable by ride-sharing firm Lyft in patent case
News of Avanci hiring a senior vice president and the EPO teaming up with a French AI startup were also among the top talking points
Explosm, the independent Texas studio behind the hit webcomic Cyanide & Happiness, partnered with Temu’s IP protection team to combat counterfeiters infringing on its brand
The latest in a dispute over juicing machines, and a shakeup in judicial compositions were also among the top developments
Patent partner Robert Hollingshead explains why the firm remains committed to Japan despite several US firms exiting the Japanese and greater Asia market
Emma Green, partner at Bird & Bird, shares why the Iceland v Iceland dispute could prompt businesses and lawyers to think differently about brand enforcement
Gift this article