UK: A copyright fairy story

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK: A copyright fairy story

A recent example of the peculiarities of UK copyright law has brought into sharp relief how the length of some IP rights can outlive changes in statute and policy.

Earlier this year it was reported that the find of a previously unpublished work by children's author Beatrix Potter had led to the extension of the term of copyright in the work, beyond the standard "life of the author plus 70 years" – a rare event and an IP story worthy of fairy tale status.

The work in question is a story entitled 'Kitty-in-Boots' and as well as the text, initial illustrations and some details of a proposed manuscript layout were discovered in the Beatrix Potter archives.

Copyright term, as we know it since the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 came into effect, has been 70 years from the date of the author's death. However the particular circumstances of this case require us to examine the, often overlooked, schedules to the Act to calculate the term of protection.

As Beatrix Potter died in 1943, the copyright term in her work expired at the end of 2013, and her work has been freely available in the public domain in the UK and other countries since 2014. Schedule I of the Act provides for exceptions to the life plus 70 rule, for works falling into certain categories and that were in existence at the date of the new Act. In particular where an author has died the 1988 Act states, for:

a) literary, dramatic and musical works of which the author has died and in relation to which none of the acts mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (e) of the proviso to section 2(3) of the 1956 Act has been done;

the copyright shall continue to subsist until the end of the period of fifty years from the end of the calendar year which includes the earliest occasion on which one of those acts is done.

The acts mentioned are publication, public performance, sale or broadcast.

Here then Kitty-in-Boots ticks off the requirements for extended copyright protection: It is a literary work; it was in existence at the date of commencement of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988; it was unpublished before the death of the author; and the author died before the 1988 Act came into force.

The term of copyright will therefore expire at the end of 50 years from 1989 (when the 1988 Act came into force) – in effect extending the copyright until the end of 2039.

After her death, the copyright in the stories of Beatrix Potter was given to her then publisher, now part of publishing house Penguin Group. The 1956 Act referred to in the 1988 Act schedule above provides that this transfer would include unpublished works, such as the now, newly unearthed Kitty-in-Boots. Penguin would therefore be the copyright owner and the beneficiary of the additional 26 years of copyright protection for the work until 2039.

This is a happy ending for the publishers, Penguin, who have now announced that they intend to publish 'The Tale of Kitty-in-Boots' later this year, on September 1 2016, to mark the 150th anniversary of Beatrix Potter's birth.

UK copyright provisions are not straightforward, as illustrated here, with the relevant acts layered upon each other. Copyright term calculations may not always be as simple as "life plus 70", and schedules such as Schedule 1 and 2A must not be overlooked.

Chapman_Helga

Helga Chapman


Chapman + Co18 Staple GardensWinchester SO23 8SRUnited KingdomTel: +44 1962 600 500  info@chapmanip.com  www.chapmanip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A multijurisdictional claim filed by InterDigital and a new spin-off firm in Germany were also among the top talking points
Duarte Lima, MD of Spruson & Ferguson’s Asia practice, says practitioners must adapt to process changes within IP systems, as well as be mindful of the implications of tech on their practices
Practitioners say the UK Supreme Court’s decision could boost the attractiveness of the UK for AI companies
New awards, including US ‘Firm of the Year’ and Latin America ‘Firm to Watch’, are among more than 90 prizes that will recognise firms and practitioners
DWF helped client Dairy UK secure a major victory at the UK Supreme Court
Hepworth Browne led Emotional Perception AI to victory at the UK Supreme Court, which rejected a previous appellate decision that said an AI network was not patentable
James Hill, general counsel at Norwich City FC, reveals how he balances fan engagement with brand enforcement, and when he calls on IP firms for advice
In the second of a two-part article, Gabrielle Faure-André and Stéphanie Garçon at Santarelli unpick EPO, UPC and French case law to assess the importance of clinical development timelines in inventive step analyses
Public figures are turning to trademark protection to combat the threat of AI deepfakes and are monetising their brand through licensing deals, a trend that law firms are keen to capitalise on
News of Avanci Video signing its first video licence and a win for patent innovators in Australia were also among the top talking points
Gift this article