Meet the new AIPLA President Denise DeFranco

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Meet the new AIPLA President Denise DeFranco

DeFranco_Denise_crop_100

AIPLA President-Elect Denise DeFranco, who takes over from Sharon Israel, talks about her goals for her upcoming term and the role that all members have in shaping IP law





DeFranco-Denise
Denise DeFranco

Denise DeFranco says that one of her main goals as AIPLA president is to make sure that members’ voices are heard in the debate about the development of IP laws around the world. To this end, she encourages members to get involved in the committees.

“One of the things that I’ve learned in my many years as a member of AIPLA is that you really can make a difference in the direction of policy in the US and abroad by getting involved in the committees,” she says. “The committees develop positions on pending rules and laws, court cases, and ultimately all the activities of the committees feed up to the Board, which in turn finalizes the policy statements that AIPLA submits.”

She continues: “The genesis of these positions really come from this committee structure, and I encourage everyone to take advantage of the opportunity – every single member can impact policy if they get involved. When I first joined, it took me a while to learn that even little old me could have an impact.”

DeFranco is a partner at Finnegan. Before entering private practice, she was a USPTO examiner and clerk to Judge Paul Michel.

DeFranco explains that her first AIPLA committee was the Amicus Committee. Some of the notable briefs that she worked on as a committee member include Bilski at the panel level, the Philips claim construction case, Merck v Integra, concerning interpretations of the Section 271(e)(1) safe harbor for infringing activities related to obtaining FDA approval, and her first AIPLA amicus brief in KP Permanent v Lasting Impression I, a 2004 Supreme Court trademark case.

For many AIPLA members, especially those practicing in the US, this involvement may be of particular importance given the many changes and debate about issues such as Section 101 and the new procedures at the PTAB. DeFranco says that the growth in the number of cases applying Section 101 has given AIPLA a real opportunity to weigh in on this important subject. Similarly, as the USPTO continues to revise rules and regulations to make the PTAB proceedings fair and balanced, the Association will have a strong voice and providing its views on issues such as the ability to amend claims.

DeFranco also says that pending litigation about non-practicing entities could have a big impact on how litigation operates, and that it’s important that any changes made do not negatively impact how practicing entities use a system that for many years have for the most part worked very well.

“We don’t want to throw the baby out with the bathwater when we look to check the abuses,” she says. “However, for these other types of patent holders, their viewpoints can easily get lost in the discussions because of all the hoopla about NPEs.”

International issues are also on DeFranco’s agenda. She explains that that harmonization efforts will have a big effect on AIPLA members and that the Association is participating in continuing discussions with bodies such as Group B+ on issues such as patent grace periods.

“I think it’s important for AIPLA to stay involved in the worldwide harmonization dialogue and commit resources to that effort,” she says.

DeFranco says that she also plans to strengthen AIPLA’s relationships with publishers. Through the Special Committee on Publications, she says that the Association looks to foster and develop relationships with publishers and to work with them to publish more works that are of interest of not only of AIPLA members but also written by the members themselves.

One topic that came up during AIPLA’s bi-annual member survey is that there appears to be demand for more educational offerings about practice management – such as how to run law firms, how to handle practice-related logistical issues and how to nurture client relationships. DeFranco says that she was somewhat surprised by this request, especially given that these topics are not traditionally an area of focus for AIPLA. That said, she points out the Association’s membership is quite diverse, and there are many experienced solo practitioners and small firm practitioners who can help provide resources to meet this need.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Sheppard has added quantum and robotics expertise to its AI industry team to help clients navigate questions around inventorship and IP infringement
The 2026 Americas ceremony recognised outstanding firms and practitioners, along with highlighting impact cases of the year
A development concerning Stephen Thaler’s AI copyright application in India and an integration between IPH group firms were also among the top talking points
As concerns around the little-known litigation tool increase, practitioners say they are educating their clients on how it can be most effective
Kilburn & Strode and Mewburn Ellis are just two firms that have invested heavily in office space – a sign that the legal industry is serious about in-person working
In major recent developments, Dyson snagged another win against Hong Kong-based competitor Dreame and a new AI-powered UPC platform was launched
Mohit and Sidhant Goel decided not to pursue an interim injunction application so that their client, Communications Components Antenna, could benefit from a fast-track trial
Anita Cade, head of Ashurst’s IP and media team in Australia, discusses why law firms that can pull together capability across different practice areas and jurisdictions stand to gain
INTA’s CEO says London-based firms have registered fewer delegates compared to past meetings in San Diego and Atlanta, and questions the 'ethics' of trying to participate without registering
Lobbies and interest groups are among the interveners in a major dispute over whether courts can set patent pool rates
Gift this article