Kyle Bass vows to keep returning to the PTAB “kangaroo court”

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Kyle Bass vows to keep returning to the PTAB “kangaroo court”

If Kyle Bass has been put off by the PTAB denying three of his IPR petitions, he's not showing it. He has filed a further nine petitions since the Coalition for Affordable Drugs' first setback and has labelled the PTAB a kangaroo court

kyle20bass20150.jpg

It has been a bad couple of weeks for hedge fund manager Kyle Bass’s efforts to get pharmaceutical companies’ patents invalidated. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has denied three of the Coalition for Affordable Drugs’ petitions – two challenging patents covering Acorda’s Ampyra drug and one covering Biogen’s Tecfidera treatment.

Bass is not taking it lying down – he has slammed the Board and USPTO director Michelle Lee while continuing to file inter partes review petitions.

“It appears to me, after the Biogen ruling, that Michelle Lee and the US Patent and Trademark Office are running a kangaroo court,” Bass told Business Insider. He added that Lee should “stick to calling balls and strikes” instead of forwarding a political agenda.

He told the Wall Street Journal he would persist in his campaign. “I’ve spent years of my life working on this and my arguments are as good as can be. I think I can win if they’ll just hear the cases on the merits,” he said.

True to his word, he has filed nine more petitions since the Board issued its first denial of a Coalition for Affordable Drugs petition on August 24, bringing his total number of petitions to 32.

Pepper Hamilton, which represents Acorda and the University of Pennsylvania on various matters, noted the manner of the Board’s denials so far may have given Bass hope. “However, in each instance, the PTAB reached decisions on the merits of the hedge fund’s petitions. The fact that the PTAB considered the petitions and did not exercise its discretion to reject them outright based on the fund’s primary goal of depressing stock prices, was all the encouragement Bass needed,” said Pepper Hamilton partner Tom Engellenner.

According to Docket Navigator, the nine recent petitions comprised four more targeting Acorda patents, three targeting Insys Pharma patents and three targeting Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania patents.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Three successive wins have got the firm eyeing additional opportunities as ITC work booms
While many firms remain focused on generative AI, recent hires and practice launches suggest the next battle may be for lawyers who understand how AI is moving into the physical world
The explosion of data centres has prompted patent pool operators to create new licensing opportunities
The court struck out copyright claims brought by Ladbrokes owner Entain, saying that ownership details should have been completed before litigation began
Düsseldorf has overtaken Munich as the UPC's busiest division, while firms including Winston Taylor, Clifford Chance, and Hoyng Rokh Monegier featured in disputes involving Abbott, Essity, Amazon and Hurom
The managing partner gave up an equity partnership track in New York to build a practice in India. More than a decade later, she discusses entrepreneurship, leadership, and why women should not wait before taking the next step
Vice presidents Shinya Jitsuhiro and Hirohisa Suzuki discuss litigation trends in Japan, recruitment challenges and clients’ international expansion
IP boutique Petillion represented IKEA in the dispute, which concerned the use of the multinational’s trademarks in an immigration-focused campaign. The firm tells Managing IP how it secured the outcome
The Pizzeys-Griffith Hack integration was designed to create a stronger Australian IP platform but with several ex-Pizzeys principals now gone, the deal's success may depend on where clients place their trust
Thomas Lonsdale and Hsu Min Chung of HGF explore the practical impact of the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal’s decision in G1/25 and its interplay with G1/24
Gift this article