Kyle Bass vows to keep returning to the PTAB “kangaroo court”

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Kyle Bass vows to keep returning to the PTAB “kangaroo court”

If Kyle Bass has been put off by the PTAB denying three of his IPR petitions, he's not showing it. He has filed a further nine petitions since the Coalition for Affordable Drugs' first setback and has labelled the PTAB a kangaroo court

kyle20bass20150.jpg

It has been a bad couple of weeks for hedge fund manager Kyle Bass’s efforts to get pharmaceutical companies’ patents invalidated. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has denied three of the Coalition for Affordable Drugs’ petitions – two challenging patents covering Acorda’s Ampyra drug and one covering Biogen’s Tecfidera treatment.

Bass is not taking it lying down – he has slammed the Board and USPTO director Michelle Lee while continuing to file inter partes review petitions.

“It appears to me, after the Biogen ruling, that Michelle Lee and the US Patent and Trademark Office are running a kangaroo court,” Bass told Business Insider. He added that Lee should “stick to calling balls and strikes” instead of forwarding a political agenda.

He told the Wall Street Journal he would persist in his campaign. “I’ve spent years of my life working on this and my arguments are as good as can be. I think I can win if they’ll just hear the cases on the merits,” he said.

True to his word, he has filed nine more petitions since the Board issued its first denial of a Coalition for Affordable Drugs petition on August 24, bringing his total number of petitions to 32.

Pepper Hamilton, which represents Acorda and the University of Pennsylvania on various matters, noted the manner of the Board’s denials so far may have given Bass hope. “However, in each instance, the PTAB reached decisions on the merits of the hedge fund’s petitions. The fact that the PTAB considered the petitions and did not exercise its discretion to reject them outright based on the fund’s primary goal of depressing stock prices, was all the encouragement Bass needed,” said Pepper Hamilton partner Tom Engellenner.

According to Docket Navigator, the nine recent petitions comprised four more targeting Acorda patents, three targeting Insys Pharma patents and three targeting Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania patents.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

As global commerce continues to expand through e-commerce platforms and digital marketplaces, protecting brands has become a growing challenge for organisations worldwide. Counterfeiting, intellectual property infringement, and online brand abuse are increasing across industries, making brand protection strategies a critical priority for businesses.
Henrik Holzapfel and Chuck Larsen of McDermott Will & Schulte explain why a Court of Appeal ruling could promote access to justice and present a growth opportunity for litigation finance
A co-partner in charge says the UK prosecution teams are a ‘vital’ part of the firm’s offering, while praising a key injunction win
A team from White & Case has checked in on behalf of Premier Inn Hotels in a UK trademark and passing off case against a cookie brand
Litigation team says pre-trial work and a Section 101 defence helped significantly limit damages payable by ride-sharing firm Lyft in patent case
News of Avanci hiring a senior vice president and the EPO teaming up with a French AI startup were also among the top talking points
Explosm, the independent Texas studio behind the hit webcomic Cyanide & Happiness, partnered with Temu’s IP protection team to combat counterfeiters infringing on its brand
The latest in a dispute over juicing machines, and a shakeup in judicial compositions were also among the top developments
Patent partner Robert Hollingshead explains why the firm remains committed to Japan despite several US firms exiting the Japanese and greater Asia market
Emma Green, partner at Bird & Bird, shares why the Iceland v Iceland dispute could prompt businesses and lawyers to think differently about brand enforcement
Gift this article