TXED drives 33% drop in US patent litigation in third quarter

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

TXED drives 33% drop in US patent litigation in third quarter

Patent litigation in the US district courts fell in the third quarter, an analysis by Lex Machina has revealed. PTAB filing and copyright litigation also fell, while trade mark litigation was up slightly

Only 1,119 US district court patent cases were filed in the second quarter, down 33% from the record 1,665 cases in the second quarter, an analysis by Lex Machina has revealed.  

Patent case filings so far this year are still up on the same period in 2014, but down on that in 2013. The third quarter drop was driven by the Eastern District of Texas, which had 435 cases – a 50% fall from its record peak in the second quarter of 839 cases.

Patent case filings in the District of Delaware increased in the third quarter by 38%, up to 138 from 100 in the second quarter. This is the first quarterly increase for the district since early 2013.

Petitions to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board were also down in the third quarter.

Inter partes review petitions filed fell to 418 from 466 in the second quarter. Lex Machina noted this decrease is “firmly within the established trend going back to mid 2014”.

Covered business method review petitions fell 50% to 20 in the third quarter. Roughly 40 CBMs have been filed a month in the long term.

Lex Machina patent litigation Q3
  Source: Lex Machina


Trade mark and copyright

The third quarter continued a trend of trade mark litigation in the US district courts being steady in 2015. The quarter had 875 trademark cases filed, compared to 831 in the second quarter and 877 in the first quarter.

Lex Machina divides copyright litigation in the US district courts into two sub-types:  file sharing cases and more traditional cases.

Case filings for traditional copyright cases fell slightly in the third quarter to 563 cases – a 1.4% decrease the 571 cases filed in the second quarter. Lex Machina reported the past few years of copyright case filings has been “quite consistent”, with generally between 500 and 600 cases a quarter. 

In contrast, new file sharing cases have dropped much more sharply. The 627 cases in the third quarter were a 21% drop from the 797 in the second quarter. File sharing cases remain a majority of copyright cases filed, but this marks the second quarter of decrease in file sharing cases from their peak of 904 cases in the first quarter of 2015.

 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Henrik Holzapfel and Chuck Larsen of McDermott Will & Schulte explain why a Court of Appeal ruling could promote access to justice and present a growth opportunity for litigation finance
A co-partner in charge says the UK prosecution teams are a ‘vital’ part of the firm’s offering, while praising a key injunction win
A team from White & Case has checked in on behalf of Premier Inn Hotels in a UK trademark and passing off case against a cookie brand
Litigation team says pre-trial work and a Section 101 defence helped significantly limit damages payable by ride-sharing firm Lyft in patent case
News of Avanci hiring a senior vice president and the EPO teaming up with a French AI startup were also among the top talking points
Explosm, the independent Texas studio behind the hit webcomic Cyanide & Happiness, partnered with Temu’s IP protection team to combat counterfeiters infringing on its brand
The latest in a dispute over juicing machines, and a shakeup in judicial compositions were also among the top developments
Patent partner Robert Hollingshead explains why the firm remains committed to Japan despite several US firms exiting the Japanese and greater Asia market
Emma Green, partner at Bird & Bird, shares why the Iceland v Iceland dispute could prompt businesses and lawyers to think differently about brand enforcement
Attain IP, developed by two UK patent lawyers, will meet ‘forensic’ needs of patent attorneys by showing a verifiable reasoning chain, according to its co-founders
Gift this article