Rihanna wins appeal in passing off case

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Rihanna wins appeal in passing off case

rihanna-logo-55.jpg

The Court of Appeal has upheld a ruling of the England & Wales High Court that Topshop committed passing off by using Rihanna’s image on t-shirts

Rihanna logo

But the judgment, published on January 22, also made it clear that there is no protection for image rights as such in UK law.

Lord Justice Kitchin said that the claimant in such cases must make his case on the evidence: “He must show that he has a relevant goodwill, that the activities of the defendant amount to a misrepresentation that he has endorsed or approved the goods or services of which he complains, and that these activities have caused or are likely to cause him damage to his goodwill and business.”

The other two judges agreed, though Lord Justice Underhill noted that he regarded this case as “close to the borderline”.

The Court rejected all four grounds on which Topshop challenged the High Court’s 2013 ruling.

Rihanna (whose so-called R slash logo is pictured) was represented by Martin Howe QC, Andrew Norris and Reed Smith. Topshop was represented by Geoffrey Hobbs QC, Hugo Cuddigan and Mishcon de Reya.

More analysis available online from Bird & Bird, Herbert Smith Freehills and King & Wood Mallesons.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The tie-up could result in the firm’s German and France-based teams, which both have strong UPC expertise, becoming independent
News of a slowdown in the UK’s clean energy IP landscape and an EPO report on unitary patent uptake were also among the top talking points
Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Gift this article