UK to reform threats provisions

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK to reform threats provisions

The UK government has broadly accepted proposals by the Law Commission to reform the law concerning threats of IP infringement

The Commission made 18 proposals, including permitting legitimate communication with secondary actors using safe harbour provisions; simplifying acts that can be referred to when approaching prospective defendants; and removing liability for professional advisers when acting on clients instructions.

Under existing laws, IP owners can be sued for making “groundless threats” when communicating with potential infringers.

The measures have long been criticised as inconsistent, complicated and out of step with measures to promote settlements.

The Law Society’s IP Law Committee, led by Isabel Davies and Robin Fry, has been working on the issue for nine years. In a statement, the Law Society welcomed the government’s announcement.

Separately, the Law Society is inviting applications to join the IP Law Committee, which has four vacancies for non-Council members. Interviews will be held on April 21 and April 30.

The deadline for applications is 17.00 on March 19.

Committee members are paid travel and subsistence expenses and an annual incidental expenses allowance.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The tie-up could result in the firm’s German and France-based teams, which both have strong UPC expertise, becoming independent
News of a slowdown in the UK’s clean energy IP landscape and an EPO report on unitary patent uptake were also among the top talking points
Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Gift this article