Scandinavia: Patent pledges now registrable

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Scandinavia: Patent pledges now registrable

On February 8 2012, the Norwegian Department of Justice proposed new legislation regarding the establishment of pledges in IP rights. The bill was introduced by the government in the form of a proposition a year later (Prop 101 L (2013–2014), and sanctioned on January 1 2015, the sanction process taking a lot longer than most IP practitioners had expected.

The new legislation came into force on July 1 2015, and it is now possible to establish a pledge in patents, patent applications and patent licences in Norway, (see the Norwegian Mortgage Act section 4-11). New rules also require that anyone who has rights under a patent must record these to be ensured protection. The priority of the pledge established is the time of pledge registration in the official patent register.

The main purpose of the new freedom to pledge is to make it easier for start-up businesses with no possibility of financing their business in other ways, and other companies that need funds to develop new ideas, to acquire capital by collateral in their patents, patent applications and licences.

It is, however, still not possible to establish a pledge in registered trade marks, registered designs or copyrights. These rights can only be pledged through the establishment of non-possessory pledges on operating accessories (Norwegian Mortgage Act section 3-4).

How to register a pledge?

For collateralisation to be registered in the patent register, a written notice must be submitted, either in paper format or electronically via email or Altinn (the Norwegian public reporting portal). The Patent Office requires documentation in order to register the pledge. A copy of the pledge agreement will, however, normally be sufficient documentation.

The fee for registration of a mortgage is kr500 ($60) for the registration of a mortgage in a patent, a patent application or a patent licence. If several patents, patent applications or patent licences will serve as security for the same claim, the fee is kr100 for each record beyond the first.

Astrup_Kristin-Kjaerheim

Kristin Kjærheim Astrup


ZaccoArne Jacobsens Alle 15DK-2300 Copenhagen S DenmarkTel: +45 39 48 80 00Fax: +45 39 48 80 80contact@zacco.comwww.zacco.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Drew & Napier’s leadership appointments show one way full-service firms can back up claims about the strategic importance of IP
Strike-out application will hear claims that the copyright aspect of an IP infringement claim brought by a gambling and sports betting group should be dropped
Amongst a sea of mergers, Lathrop GPM and HG Law have set out plans to combine, positioning themselves to compete with both IP boutiques and full-service firms
Patrícia Paias explains why she loves the science and business behind an idea and why potential rights owners must avoid the ‘file and forget’ philosophy
Lawyers eagerly await news of what IP specialist Sir Colin Birss will bring to one of the England and Wales judiciary’s most important roles
María Aurora García of Berken IP explains how intellectual property rights holders can use customs monitoring and online enforcement tools to identify parallel imports and support compliance with consumer protection rules
The Jakarta-based firm says personal networks and a distinctive strategy can help it guide foreign clients through what can be a tricky IP landscape
Munich litigation boutique formed by former Taylor Wessing partners continues expansion as it seeks to cement its position in the UPC market
Yvonne Tang and Siau Wen Lim, the second and third IP specialists to sit on the firm’s management committee, say IP is ‘uniquely positioned’ to support cross-practice work
As competing firms come under common ownership, clients may care less about formal conflicts and more about how openly firms discuss them
Gift this article