Scandinavia: Patent pledges now registrable

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Scandinavia: Patent pledges now registrable

On February 8 2012, the Norwegian Department of Justice proposed new legislation regarding the establishment of pledges in IP rights. The bill was introduced by the government in the form of a proposition a year later (Prop 101 L (2013–2014), and sanctioned on January 1 2015, the sanction process taking a lot longer than most IP practitioners had expected.

The new legislation came into force on July 1 2015, and it is now possible to establish a pledge in patents, patent applications and patent licences in Norway, (see the Norwegian Mortgage Act section 4-11). New rules also require that anyone who has rights under a patent must record these to be ensured protection. The priority of the pledge established is the time of pledge registration in the official patent register.

The main purpose of the new freedom to pledge is to make it easier for start-up businesses with no possibility of financing their business in other ways, and other companies that need funds to develop new ideas, to acquire capital by collateral in their patents, patent applications and licences.

It is, however, still not possible to establish a pledge in registered trade marks, registered designs or copyrights. These rights can only be pledged through the establishment of non-possessory pledges on operating accessories (Norwegian Mortgage Act section 3-4).

How to register a pledge?

For collateralisation to be registered in the patent register, a written notice must be submitted, either in paper format or electronically via email or Altinn (the Norwegian public reporting portal). The Patent Office requires documentation in order to register the pledge. A copy of the pledge agreement will, however, normally be sufficient documentation.

The fee for registration of a mortgage is kr500 ($60) for the registration of a mortgage in a patent, a patent application or a patent licence. If several patents, patent applications or patent licences will serve as security for the same claim, the fee is kr100 for each record beyond the first.

Astrup_Kristin-Kjaerheim

Kristin Kjærheim Astrup


ZaccoArne Jacobsens Alle 15DK-2300 Copenhagen S DenmarkTel: +45 39 48 80 00Fax: +45 39 48 80 80contact@zacco.comwww.zacco.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

This year’s IP STARS Americas rankings reveal that firms are expanding their capabilities, particularly in trade secrets and life sciences
Law firms’ expanding IP capabilities are driving broader industry recognition across a wider range of practice areas
As specialist boutiques challenge traditional firm models, major disputes involving Disney, Ericsson, Siemens and Dolby highlight the firms winning work before the UPC
The firm has added two leading damages specialists as it expands beyond technical analysis and deepens its role in the economics of IP litigation
Josh Seidenfeld, partner at DLA Piper, outlines the emerging legal trends that drive the future of life sciences innovation and how stakeholders can prepare for the future
South Korea's One Law Partners is combining with boutique firm Minwho Law Group to leverage global expansion of K-content and build a broader offering spanning IP, tech and regulatory advisory work
Russell Kennedy's Gina Tresidder on juggling matters, delivering hard truths, and why IP ownership is rarely as simple as people think
Attorney Oran Friar and trainee attorney Harry Cunliffe at Reddie & Grose, share that patent filings for clinical LLMs are surging, but success in the UK and Europe hinges on demonstrating technical innovation
Implementers can use the UK courts to seek FRAND terms for patent pool licences
The first credible UPC spinouts are growing, and they are coming from elite patent litigation teams, suggesting specialist litigators may no longer need large platforms to compete
Gift this article