Scandinavia: Patent pledges now registrable
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Scandinavia: Patent pledges now registrable

On February 8 2012, the Norwegian Department of Justice proposed new legislation regarding the establishment of pledges in IP rights. The bill was introduced by the government in the form of a proposition a year later (Prop 101 L (2013–2014), and sanctioned on January 1 2015, the sanction process taking a lot longer than most IP practitioners had expected.

The new legislation came into force on July 1 2015, and it is now possible to establish a pledge in patents, patent applications and patent licences in Norway, (see the Norwegian Mortgage Act section 4-11). New rules also require that anyone who has rights under a patent must record these to be ensured protection. The priority of the pledge established is the time of pledge registration in the official patent register.

The main purpose of the new freedom to pledge is to make it easier for start-up businesses with no possibility of financing their business in other ways, and other companies that need funds to develop new ideas, to acquire capital by collateral in their patents, patent applications and licences.

It is, however, still not possible to establish a pledge in registered trade marks, registered designs or copyrights. These rights can only be pledged through the establishment of non-possessory pledges on operating accessories (Norwegian Mortgage Act section 3-4).

How to register a pledge?

For collateralisation to be registered in the patent register, a written notice must be submitted, either in paper format or electronically via email or Altinn (the Norwegian public reporting portal). The Patent Office requires documentation in order to register the pledge. A copy of the pledge agreement will, however, normally be sufficient documentation.

The fee for registration of a mortgage is kr500 ($60) for the registration of a mortgage in a patent, a patent application or a patent licence. If several patents, patent applications or patent licences will serve as security for the same claim, the fee is kr100 for each record beyond the first.

Astrup_Kristin-Kjaerheim

Kristin Kjærheim Astrup


ZaccoArne Jacobsens Alle 15DK-2300 Copenhagen S DenmarkTel: +45 39 48 80 00Fax: +45 39 48 80 80contact@zacco.comwww.zacco.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A majority of clients – particularly high-earning businesses – want advisers with demonstrable social credentials, according to a survey of more than 28,000 corporate counsel
The US Supreme Court’s ruling in Warner Chappell Music v Nealy is a boost for certain copyright plaintiffs, but some counsel wonder if the court addressed the right question
Private equity firm Adamantem Capital leads the race to acquire Australia-based intellectual property business Qantm IP
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Counsel at four firms reveal how they supervise associates on pro bono matters and what kind of volunteer work their attorneys do
Kramer Levin litigators explain how they secured victory for their client against Microsoft subsidiary Activision in a dispute concerning the video game ‘Call of Duty’
Steven Cooper, partner at Ware Fressola Maguire & Barber, explains what sponsoring Brand Action means for his firm and why the IP community is well-placed to help
Tilman Müller-Stoy reveals why he never made it as a footballer and how he could have had an alternative career as a fire juggler
As the UPC approaches its first anniversary, there’s a risk that persisting teething issues will continue to be the major pain points
Justin Davidson and Stanley Ng of Norton Rose Fulbright discuss what China’s recent Ultraman ruling does and doesn’t say about who is responsible when an AI system infringes copyright
Gift this article