Scandinavia: Patent pledges now registrable

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Scandinavia: Patent pledges now registrable

On February 8 2012, the Norwegian Department of Justice proposed new legislation regarding the establishment of pledges in IP rights. The bill was introduced by the government in the form of a proposition a year later (Prop 101 L (2013–2014), and sanctioned on January 1 2015, the sanction process taking a lot longer than most IP practitioners had expected.

The new legislation came into force on July 1 2015, and it is now possible to establish a pledge in patents, patent applications and patent licences in Norway, (see the Norwegian Mortgage Act section 4-11). New rules also require that anyone who has rights under a patent must record these to be ensured protection. The priority of the pledge established is the time of pledge registration in the official patent register.

The main purpose of the new freedom to pledge is to make it easier for start-up businesses with no possibility of financing their business in other ways, and other companies that need funds to develop new ideas, to acquire capital by collateral in their patents, patent applications and licences.

It is, however, still not possible to establish a pledge in registered trade marks, registered designs or copyrights. These rights can only be pledged through the establishment of non-possessory pledges on operating accessories (Norwegian Mortgage Act section 3-4).

How to register a pledge?

For collateralisation to be registered in the patent register, a written notice must be submitted, either in paper format or electronically via email or Altinn (the Norwegian public reporting portal). The Patent Office requires documentation in order to register the pledge. A copy of the pledge agreement will, however, normally be sufficient documentation.

The fee for registration of a mortgage is kr500 ($60) for the registration of a mortgage in a patent, a patent application or a patent licence. If several patents, patent applications or patent licences will serve as security for the same claim, the fee is kr100 for each record beyond the first.

Astrup_Kristin-Kjaerheim

Kristin Kjærheim Astrup


ZaccoArne Jacobsens Alle 15DK-2300 Copenhagen S DenmarkTel: +45 39 48 80 00Fax: +45 39 48 80 80contact@zacco.comwww.zacco.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Sheppard has added quantum and robotics expertise to its AI industry team to help clients navigate questions around inventorship and IP infringement
The 2026 Americas ceremony recognised outstanding firms and practitioners, along with highlighting impact cases of the year
A development concerning Stephen Thaler’s AI copyright application in India and an integration between IPH group firms were also among the top talking points
As concerns around the little-known litigation tool increase, practitioners say they are educating their clients on how it can be most effective
Kilburn & Strode and Mewburn Ellis are just two firms that have invested heavily in office space – a sign that the legal industry is serious about in-person working
In major recent developments, Dyson snagged another win against Hong Kong-based competitor Dreame and a new AI-powered UPC platform was launched
Mohit and Sidhant Goel decided not to pursue an interim injunction application so that their client, Communications Components Antenna, could benefit from a fast-track trial
Anita Cade, head of Ashurst’s IP and media team in Australia, discusses why law firms that can pull together capability across different practice areas and jurisdictions stand to gain
INTA’s CEO says London-based firms have registered fewer delegates compared to past meetings in San Diego and Atlanta, and questions the 'ethics' of trying to participate without registering
Lobbies and interest groups are among the interveners in a major dispute over whether courts can set patent pool rates
Gift this article