Confidential information and cybersecurity

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Confidential information and cybersecurity

Businesses that rely on confidential information for a competitive advantage need to take practical steps on cybersecurity, and prepare for the long-term ramifications of the proposed EU trade secrets directive

EU flag

There is a divergence in terminology and the protection regime for confidential information in the EU. For example, in England a trade secret is seen as a subset of confidential information protected under contract or the common law of breach of confidence; while in Germany confidential information is treated as a general concept, the protection of which comes from various statutory provisions including criminal law.

This affects cross-border research and development activities, which often lead to innovation, and those who rely heavily on confidential information for competitiveness. The protection accorded to confidential information is directed at its acquisition, disclosure and use. The cyber-attack against Sony Pictures Entertainment is a recent example.

All this is why many welcome the proposed trade secrets directive which, albeit with some fine-tuning, will harmonise the law to provide some reassurance to businesses.

The proposed directive is awaiting the decision of the EU parliament and is set to go before the plenary on November 24. Its adoption and implementation is still some time away, but now is the time to start planning for the ramifications as well as putting appropriate measures in place to safeguard confidential information.

“In the short term changes in law will be minor, but in the long term it will be quite big as the EU Court of Justice gets involved in its interpretation,” says Anthony Trenton, one of the speakers at a seminar to be held this evening at the London offices of WilmerHale.

The seminar, titled ‘Protecting Confidential Information’, will discuss the current state of the law; the proposed EU trade secrets directive; and cybersecurity. Trevor Cook, Klaus Schubert and Trenton will open the seminar with an overview of the law in England and Germany, and a discussion on how the directive will change law and practice in this area - issues such as dealing with licences and employees are expected to be covered.

The session will end with Robert S. Mueller III, a former FBI director, who will talk about the practical measures to guard against cyber-attack and/or deal with such attacks.

We will publish a report on the seminar later this week.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

AI, cybersecurity and data practice group will provide clients with legal guidance around AI alongside a 'deep technical foundation’ in IP
Lawyers at Vondst and Biopatents say a ruling concerning the protected status of trade secrets could see the UPC flooded with requests to prevent access to confidential information
Sharad Vadehra of Kan & Krishme discusses why older IP firms still have an edge over up-and-coming boutiques and how the firm is using AI to provide quick and cost-effective service
Lawyers at Appleyard Lees share how they picked apart a plant breeder’s infringement claims concerning the ‘Tango’ mandarin
A further decision on long-arm status, and a new hire for Pentarc in Germany from Taylor Wessing were also among top developments
The US decision marks a rare grant of a request under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act in a patent case
Stobbs has applied to strike out a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
With trademark volumes surging, trademark teams need to think beyond traditional clearance searches, towards a continuous, intelligence-led workflow, says Meghan Medeiros of Corsearch
Brazilian in-house counsel say law firms’ technology investments have not translated into tangible benefits, meaning tech use is a minor factor when selecting advisers
A lack of comfort among some salaried partners shows why law firms must actively foster inclusion, not merely focus on diversity mandates
Gift this article