Is the prohibition on disparaging marks unconstitutional?

April 22 2015

The Federal Circuit affirmed the USPTO’s rejection of an application for the The Slants mark on the grounds that the term was disparaging to Asians. After drafting the court’s opinion, Judge Kimberly Moore penned an “additional views” section questioning the constitutionality of Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act

Unlock this content.

The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.

To unlock this content:

Request Access or Login

Topics

Trademarks News Jurisdictions United States (National)

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Patents

Weekly take: Global reach means little without global integration

Law firms continue to sell clients on international footprints, but sprawling office networks count for little if financial structures discourage internal collaboration

Max Walters, October 09 2026

Patents

Woman,Charging,Smartphone,Using,Wireless,Charging,Pad,At,Home

Breaking: Via adds Oppo and Nidec to Qi patent pool

Via's Qi pool expands its footprint in Asia with the addition of Chinese smartphone giant and Japanese auto company

Sanjana Mishra, October 08 2026

Patents

Exclusive: Hoffmann Eitle doubles up on HGF talent in London growth push

Matthew Cassie becomes the tenth partner to join the firm’s London outpost, and the second since it opened its new headquarters in May this year

October 08 2026

Patents

UPC update: Munich talent battle heats up | Firms ready for KeeeX v OpenAI showdown

A&O Shearman and Fish & Richardson invested in German talent, meanwhile, major firms have assembled for an on the merits case pitting KeeeX against OpenAI and Adobe

October 08 2026

IP Ones to Watch