What are the IP industry disrupters?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

What are the IP industry disrupters?

What working practices and new services could disrupt the way that businesses seek legal advice on IP, or IP prosecution services?

Last week we began a new series of articles and interviews in our Women in IP Network focused on different ways of working in the profession. We began with an interview with Louisa Fielding, a trade mark attorney who works as a freelance consultant.

Fielding used to work at a large London-based firm before she launched her own business. But as well as working under her own name, Louisa also works with a number of new networks that have been set up to match businesses in need of an attorney with freelance professionals in search of short-term assignments.

One of the networks she works with is K2, created by lawyers at Keltie. It gives her access to a back office and records system, assistance with marketing, and a network of patent and trade mark attorneys she can check in with, put together pitches with, and share know-how with.

The obvious upside for Fielding is flexibility: she can choose when to work and what work she wants to do. She may not be as accessible to her clients as a team of attorneys working at a large firm, but using a freelance consultant offers them other advantages. Without the need to service a smart city-centre office her rates are invariably cheaper than those of her salaried peers. She can also work in-house on temporary assignments without the client feeling like the joint is being cased by a seconded lawyer looking to win more work for his or her employers.

The interview made me think about whether these types of working relationships represent the future for the IP legal profession. A number of law firm partners have told me that fewer lawyers are willing to work the kind of hours or make the kinds of commitments they did just 20 years ago. Following the financial crisis, when many firms shrank and lawyers were let go, IP professionals realised that loyalty didn’t always run both ways. As Fielding told me, more of them want to set up on their own and take more control over the way they work. Factor in the potential cost savings for clients, and this could change the market for IP professionals.

But what other working practices and new services could disrupt the way that businesses seek legal advice on IP, or IP prosecution services? At Managing IP we want to find some of the cutting-edge developments that are shaping the future of the profession. Do let us know if you think the way you or your business works fits that description.

You can find out more about Managing IP’s Women in IP Network here.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
Gift this article