Speaking a common language: The changing relationship between IP law firms, in-house IP and their technology providers

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Speaking a common language: The changing relationship between IP law firms, in-house IP and their technology providers

CPA Global worked with Managing IP and Thought Leadership Consulting to compile findings on what in-house counsel look for in external IP firms, what law firms look for when co-operating with other IP firms and what firms and in-house counsel seek from technology providers

CPA Global has collaborated with Managing Intellectual Property and Thought Leadership Consulting to produce a report about the relationship between corporates and private practice practitioners and how they can work together more effectively. The report also covers law firms’ requirements when working with external IP firms. The findings are based on responses from more than 1,000 patent and trademark professionals, 603 of whom are in-house counsel and 434 of whom are based in law firms. The respondents span 80 countries.

Some of the questions asked concern the most important factors when choosing an external law firm, relationships with service providers and the main challenges that arise when managing external IP firms.

A selection of the key findings from the report are detailed below.

Loyalty

More than half (51%) of in-house respondents stated that they were “very unlikely” to change external IP firm, indicating a culture of strong loyalty to law firms.

The most important factors when choosing a law firm

Those who answered the survey were asked their three most important considerations when choosing an external firm. Practice area knowledge was cited as a key factor by 18% of respondents, followed closely by responsiveness (mentioned as the main factor by 11% of respondents). Indeed, responsiveness was repeatedly mentioned in interviews with both law firm practitioners and in-house counsel.

Challenges

Both law firm practitioners and those in-house asserted that effective communication proves to be a key challenge when liaising with external firms. Overall, 18% of respondents said that this was their biggest challenge. Among law firm practitioners, there was even greater emphasis on effective communication, with 21% citing this as the number one challenge. The findings indicated that more face-to-face contact with IP firms is required.

The 2018 and 2019 surveys

A comparison of the 2018 and 2019 surveys suggest that many of the key challenges faced by corporates remain the same. In 2018, “cost pressures and aligning IP with business strategy came out top” and in 2019, “the leading challenges are “billing within budget” and “ensuring external advisors understand IP strategy.”” Much like the 2018 interviewees, in-house respondents this year averred that the main qualities they are looking for are practice area knowledge, depth and strength of team, responsiveness and cost.

Technology and service providers

The report notes that “the findings suggest that firms are not using IP management software as wisely as they could be.” In relation to search providers, 59% of law firms said they use many search service providers. Only 18% of in-house respondents use one main search provider.

To read the full report, please click here.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
Gift this article