FBI on anti-counterfeiting: “collaborate early and often with law enforcement”

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

FBI on anti-counterfeiting: “collaborate early and often with law enforcement”

FBI thumb

Anti-counterfeiting specialists from the FBI and Interpol reveal the challenges they face; from data privacy rules to public perception

FBI

Representatives from the FBI and Interpol discussed their efforts around anti-counterfeiting at INTA’s Annual Meeting in Boston at the end of May.

Liam Gimon, criminal intelligence officer at Interpol in Singapore, said that the biggest barrier to effective anti-counterfeiting is data protection. From laws like the General Data Protection Regulation in Europe to Interpol’s own data privacy policies, sharing industry information with police is tough, Gimon said.

Yet communication and data sharing is necessary for effectiveness. “A lot of times the country of origin has no idea counterfeit products are being made there until we tell them, so communication is vital,” Gimon explained.

Interference and corruption

Cross-border communication and cooperation results in more detailed and successful investigations, but data sharing is currently inhibited on both a cultural and legal level. Interpol is in the process of revamping its data sharing policies to become more open.

There can be political interference as well. For example, China supports capital punishment for counterfeiting in the pharmaceutical space. In response, UK authorities resolved not to share data with China.

Perhaps the most important issue for anti-counterfeiting is simply a lack of awareness. Gimon explained: “Industry is motivated, but governments don’t give it a lot of attention, and between countries, there’s a lot of corruption in this space.”

Interpol’s strategy takes a three-pronged approach:

-       awareness, specifically with judges and police officers, emphasising that counterfeiting is a crime;

-       capacity, implementing the latest technology;

-       and operations, which includes “the fun stuff, like kicking down doors,” Gimon said.

The international organisation runs various global programmes to fight counterfeits, including Operations Opson and Pangea, which monitor counterfeit foods and pharmaceuticals, respectively. It also carries out regional initiatives, such as Operation Rainfall, which aims to protect medical devices in Southeast Asia, and Operation Hawk, about to be launched for the luxury goods industry.

Barriers to entry


Steven Shapiro, IP unit chief at the FBI, said that his overall strategy is “to create so many barriers to entry that it’s not worth it to counterfeit”. Like Gimon, Shapiro emphasised the importance of education, as it could be the key to behaviour change in the market.

“Some consumers are just going to buy counterfeits,” Shapiro said. “Others have no idea that what they’re buying is counterfeit, and would change their habits if they did. We’ve got to change the value proposition, and emphasise that it's something that could be harmful to you as a consumer.”

Thankfully, brands play an important role. “Unlike most other forms of crime,” explained Shapiro, “IP cases are different because industry is involved, and it helps us get to an indictment point a lot faster.”

He encouraged brands to approach him with questions, and recommended that they “collaborate early and often with law enforcement” when it comes to anti-counterfeiting efforts.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm reveals how its litigation strategies informed the arguments that took Masimo’s judgment past $818 million
The firm was rebuilding its IP practice through a string of patent hires and a Texas expansion, but its dissolution has put the newly built talent back into the market
AI can exploit longstanding gaps in copyright protection at remarkable speed, but EU law still provides tools to fight back, says Simon Hembt at Bird & Bird
The firm has tapped a local patent trio to establish a foothold in the market and broaden its national presence
New Asia-Pacific IP head Jonathan Chu is eyeing opportunities arising from Chinese technology licensing, overseas enforcement and increasingly IP-heavy cross-border deals
Europe’s largest intellectual property convention and trade fair is back: IP Service World 2026 takes place in Munich from November 23–25 – the 16th edition, with 1,400-plus attendees from 55-plus nations, 100-plus speakers, and 100-plus exhibitors. Three days. Two focused areas. One IP marketplace.
Mehmet Gün and Uğur Aktekin discuss four decades of change in Türkiye’s legal market, the firm’s commitment to independence and the challenge of building an institution that can outlast its founders
Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
Gift this article