Long-awaited reform: Zambia’s new Trade Marks Act now in force

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Long-awaited reform: Zambia’s new Trade Marks Act now in force

Sponsored by

spoor-fisher-400px.png
Zambian flag

Matthew Costard of Spoor & Fisher Jersey outlines the key developments and says the modernisation of the country’s intellectual property regime presents immediate opportunities for brand owners

As noted in articles by Spoor & Fisher in 2024 and 2022, Zambia published a new Trade Marks Bill that was passed by Parliament on December 26 2023 and enacted as the Trade Marks Act, 2023 (Act No. 11 of 2023). The legislative reforms came into force on December 31 2025 following the issuance of Statutory Instrument No. 86 of 2025, marking a milestone in the modernisation of Zambia’s trademark system.

The new act repeals the Trade Marks Act (Chapter 401) of 1958, which had remained largely unchanged for more than six decades and was rooted in the UK Trade Marks Act 1938. The updated legislation aligns Zambia’s trademark law with international standards and modern practice, creating a system familiar to practitioners in other jurisdictions.

The act introduces several important changes and the registry is working to update its systems to enable applications to be processed under the new provisions. It is hoped that these developments, along with the necessary publication of the new accompanying regulations, will happen quickly.

Key developments under the new act

Expanded scope of registrable rights

One of the most notable developments is the formal introduction of service mark protection. Service providers may now secure direct registration in the relevant service classes, rather than relying on indirect or imperfect protection through goods classifications. This change significantly strengthens brand protection for businesses operating in the services sector.

The act also introduces protection for collective marks and geographical indications, and expressly accommodates a broader range of non-traditional trademarks, provided they meet the applicable registrability criteria.

Well-known marks

The legislation gives explicit recognition to well-known marks, enhancing the ability of rights holders to prevent conflicting registrations and enforce their rights even in circumstances where no local registration exists.

Registration terms and renewal

Trademark registrations will now be granted and renewed for a period of 10 years. Existing registrations obtained under the previous legislation remain valid until their current expiry dates, after which renewal will be governed by the new act.

Filing and examination procedures

The registration process has been modernised in several respects:

  • Applications may be filed on the basis of a bona fide intention to use.

  • Multi-class applications are now permitted, allowing applicants to cover multiple goods and service classes in a single filing. Pending the issuance of new regulations, official fees are expected to continue to apply on a per-class basis.

  • Applications will be subject to substantive examination.

Grounds for refusal and opposition

Both absolute and relative grounds for refusal may be raised, including conflicts with earlier rights and well-known marks. In appropriate cases, honest concurrent use may be relied upon to overcome objections based on prior rights. Third-party opposition proceedings are expressly provided for. The act also introduces the concept of acquiescence, limiting the ability to oppose or challenge a mark where the earlier rights holder has knowingly tolerated use for five years or more.

Use requirements and ownership changes

Registered marks will be vulnerable to cancellation if they are not put to genuine use for a continuous period of five years or more. The act further provides a clear framework for the assignment and licensing of trademarks.

Enforcement and anti-counterfeiting measures

The new legislation significantly strengthens enforcement options, combining civil remedies, criminal offences, and border-control measures to address infringement and counterfeiting. Infringement may arise where the use of a similar mark on similar goods or services gives rise to a likelihood of confusion, or where unfair advantage is taken of, or harm is caused to, the reputation or distinctive character of a registered mark.

Available remedies include injunctions, damages, accounts of profits, delivery-up of infringing goods, and royalty-based relief. The act also provides for evidence-preservation measures, addresses unjustified threats of infringement proceedings, and introduces a range of offences aimed at combating counterfeit trade.

International registrations

Although Zambia’s new legislation empowers the minister of commerce, trade and industry to implement the Madrid Protocol by regulation, no such regulations have yet been issued, meaning that international trademark registrations designating Zambia currently have no legal effect or enforceability. It is also understood that future implementation is unlikely to apply retrospectively.

Practical implications for rights holders

The coming into force of the new Trade Marks Act presents immediate opportunities for brand owners, particularly those offering services in or into Zambia. Rights holders should consider reviewing their existing portfolios to assess class coverage, renewal planning, and the potential benefits of multi-class filings. Businesses making use of service marks that have not previously been registered should also consider taking steps to secure formal protection under the new regime.

In conclusion, the overhaul of Zambia’s trademark legislation was long overdue and is a welcome development. Whilst the Trade Marks Act is now fully operational, the accompanying regulations will need to be in place before multi-class and service mark applications can be filed, and implementing regulations will need to be in place before international registrations designating Zambia are enforceable. Spoor & Fisher would recommend that proprietors consider their filing strategy at this time so they can be ready to act as soon as the regulations are published.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partners Alex Wilson and Andreas Kramer say bigger law firm rivals don’t necessarily gain by having a wider jurisdictional reach
VO, which has offices in the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany, is the second European IP firm to secure external backing this week
The Bardehle Pagenberg attorneys-at-law discuss the firm’s Managing IP EMEA Awards 2026 success, Unified Patent Court litigation strategy, and evolving European patent trends
A patent battle between two legal tech companies and a loss for Elon Musk’s xAI against OpenAI were also among the top talking points
With drug prices a hot topic in the US, courts are seemingly more reluctant to prevent the entry of generics to the market
Academic Eden Sarid joins us during Pride Month to discuss queer expression and IP law, Patagonia v Pattie Gonia, and how queer and AI-generated creations both pose novelty concerns
Patent attorney Michael Henson joins the firm to lead its freshly launched blockchain and digital assets practice
A dispute over mammogram technology, and a development in the case between GSK and Moderna were also among the top talking points in recent weeks
With rankings for Western Europe set to be published on June 25, we sat down with our research lead to find out what practitioners and law firms can expect
Peter O’Sullivan, a professional services executive, says he is looking forward to helping Pearce IP become the leading life sciences firm in Australia and New Zealand
Gift this article