Maldives: New trademark legislation ends era of cautionary notices

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Maldives: New trademark legislation ends era of cautionary notices

Sponsored by

spoor-fisher-400px.png
Houses on water in the Maldives

The introduction of a formal registration system under the Trademark Act modernises brand protection in the Maldives and signals a historic shift for rights holders, says Matthew Costard of Spoor & Fisher Jersey

On November 11 2025, the Republic of Maldives enacted the Trademark Act (Law No. 19/2025), creating the country’s first comprehensive statutory framework for trademark protection. This landmark legislation will come into force 12 months after its enactment, on November 11 2026, replacing the long-standing informal practice of publishing cautionary notices with a modern registration regime aligned with international standards. The act introduces a robust examination procedure, structured opposition processes, and remedies for infringement and counterfeiting.

The Trademark Act will operate in conjunction with the Maldives Intellectual Property Office Act 2025 (Law No. 12/2025), which establishes the institutional infrastructure for intellectual property administration and is set to come into effect on January 1 2026.

The regulations covering procedures, fees, and operational requirements have not yet been published, but they must be in place no later than May 11 2027.

Key features of the Trademark Act

The most notable aspects of the Trademark Act are as follows:

  • Broad definition of a trademark as “any sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from those of another”, including names, letters, numbers, figurative elements, symbols, shapes, patterns, and combinations thereof;

  • Provision for certification and collective marks;

  • Provision for claiming convention priority (although it should be noted that the Maldives has not yet acceded to the Paris Convention);

  • Protection for well-known marks;

  • Examination on absolute and relative grounds;

  • Three-month opposition period from publication;

  • Ten-year registration terms;

  • Six-month grace period for renewal;

  • Vulnerability to cancellation for non-use after five years from registration;

  • Civil and criminal remedies for infringement and counterfeiting; and

  • Border control enforcement.

Status of existing cautionary notices

There are no express transitional provisions covering cautionary notices, which means that trademark owners should not be able to claim statutory priority or seniority for marks based solely on their publication history. On the other hand, it is anticipated that existing cautionary notice publications may serve as valuable evidence of prior use and established trademark rights when applying for formal registration. While this may not constitute legal priority under the act, such evidence could be relevant in examination proceedings or disputes regarding trademark validity and ownership.

In these circumstances, it is strongly recommended that trademark owners maintain their existing cautionary notice publications until the new registration system is up and running.

Transitional period

It has been reported that there will be a 12-month transitional period (from November 11 2026 to November 11 2027), during which trademark owners that previously relied on cautionary notices must formally register their marks in order to preserve their prior ‘rights’. In the absence of express transitional provisions granting priority or seniority rights to trademarks that were published as cautionary notices, it is difficult to see how this would work. Hopefully, the position will be clarified when the regulations are published.

Summary

The Trademark Act represents a historic modernisation of the Maldives’ brand-protection landscape. It introduces the country’s first formal registration system for trademarks and replaces the informal practice of publishing cautionary notices. With the act taking effect on November 11 2026, rights holders should review their portfolios and prepare for a timely transition to avoid loss of protection.

For more information, email info@spoor.co.uk.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

In the ninth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP & ME, a community focused on ethnic minority IP professionals
Firms that made strategic PTAB hires say that insider expertise is becoming more valuable in the wake of USPTO changes
Aled Richards-Jones, a litigator and qualified barrister, is the fourth partner to join the firm’s growing patent litigation team this year
An IP lawyer tasked with helping to develop Brownstein’s newly unveiled New York office is eyeing a measured approach to talent hunting
Amanda Griffiths, who will be tasked with expanding the firm’s trademark offering in New Zealand, says she hopes to offer greater flexibility to clients at her new home
News of EasyGroup failing in its trademark infringement claim against ‘Easihire’ and Amgen winning a key appeal at the UPC were also among the top talking points
Submit your nominations to this year's WIBL EMEA Awards by February 16 2026
Edward Russavage and Maria Crusey at Wolf Greenfield say that OpenAI MDL could broaden discovery and reshape how clients navigate AI copyright disputes
The UPC has increased some fees by as much as 32%, but firms and their clients had been getting a good deal so far
Meryl Koh, equity director and litigator at Drew & Napier in Singapore, discusses an uptick in cross-border litigation and why collaboration across practice areas is becoming crucial
Gift this article