Maldives: New trademark legislation ends era of cautionary notices

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Maldives: New trademark legislation ends era of cautionary notices

Sponsored by

spoor-fisher-400px.png
Houses on water in the Maldives

The introduction of a formal registration system under the Trademark Act modernises brand protection in the Maldives and signals a historic shift for rights holders, says Matthew Costard of Spoor & Fisher Jersey

On November 11 2025, the Republic of Maldives enacted the Trademark Act (Law No. 19/2025), creating the country’s first comprehensive statutory framework for trademark protection. This landmark legislation will come into force 12 months after its enactment, on November 11 2026, replacing the long-standing informal practice of publishing cautionary notices with a modern registration regime aligned with international standards. The act introduces a robust examination procedure, structured opposition processes, and remedies for infringement and counterfeiting.

The Trademark Act will operate in conjunction with the Maldives Intellectual Property Office Act 2025 (Law No. 12/2025), which establishes the institutional infrastructure for intellectual property administration and is set to come into effect on January 1 2026.

The regulations covering procedures, fees, and operational requirements have not yet been published, but they must be in place no later than May 11 2027.

Key features of the Trademark Act

The most notable aspects of the Trademark Act are as follows:

  • Broad definition of a trademark as “any sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from those of another”, including names, letters, numbers, figurative elements, symbols, shapes, patterns, and combinations thereof;

  • Provision for certification and collective marks;

  • Provision for claiming convention priority (although it should be noted that the Maldives has not yet acceded to the Paris Convention);

  • Protection for well-known marks;

  • Examination on absolute and relative grounds;

  • Three-month opposition period from publication;

  • Ten-year registration terms;

  • Six-month grace period for renewal;

  • Vulnerability to cancellation for non-use after five years from registration;

  • Civil and criminal remedies for infringement and counterfeiting; and

  • Border control enforcement.

Status of existing cautionary notices

There are no express transitional provisions covering cautionary notices, which means that trademark owners should not be able to claim statutory priority or seniority for marks based solely on their publication history. On the other hand, it is anticipated that existing cautionary notice publications may serve as valuable evidence of prior use and established trademark rights when applying for formal registration. While this may not constitute legal priority under the act, such evidence could be relevant in examination proceedings or disputes regarding trademark validity and ownership.

In these circumstances, it is strongly recommended that trademark owners maintain their existing cautionary notice publications until the new registration system is up and running.

Transitional period

It has been reported that there will be a 12-month transitional period (from November 11 2026 to November 11 2027), during which trademark owners that previously relied on cautionary notices must formally register their marks in order to preserve their prior ‘rights’. In the absence of express transitional provisions granting priority or seniority rights to trademarks that were published as cautionary notices, it is difficult to see how this would work. Hopefully, the position will be clarified when the regulations are published.

Summary

The Trademark Act represents a historic modernisation of the Maldives’ brand-protection landscape. It introduces the country’s first formal registration system for trademarks and replaces the informal practice of publishing cautionary notices. With the act taking effect on November 11 2026, rights holders should review their portfolios and prepare for a timely transition to avoid loss of protection.

For more information, email info@spoor.co.uk.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Barry Greenbaum, partner at Olshan Frome Wolosky, explains how in-house teams can update their approach to brand development, and where AI can add value
Christine Chiramel, who joins a full-service law firm after 17 years of working at specialist firms, says she’s excited to explore how corporate commercial issues are blurring into IP
Practitioners say increasing the pecuniary jurisdiction of India’s most popular IP litigation forum to around $2 million would spark unpredictability and make it difficult for SMEs to benefit
The Spain-based firm has appointed an industry veteran to lead the group, which it hopes will strengthen its ability to support clients in ‘disruptive technologies’
Shaina Haria, a final-seat trainee at an international law firm’s UK office, shares how she fell in love with IP and why the area of law has changed the way she views the world
Now in its sixth edition, the IP Case Law Conference was focussed on the notion of ‘growing through change’
Nick Redfearn and Khanh Nguyen of Rouse discuss Vietnam’s latest identification in the 2026 Special 301 Report and how the country is taking genuine steps to meet US expectations
Tatiana Campello reflects on 30 years of practising at the firm, and urges women IP attorneys to think beyond the day-to-day
A David v Goliath battle involving TikTok, and Via Licensing Alliance adding new members to its Voice Codec patent pool, were also among the top talking points
Latham & Watkins bolstered its IP litigation bench in California with the addition of Kieran Kieckhefer, as partner demand for trial-ready expertise shows no sign of slowing
Gift this article