Maldives: New trademark legislation ends era of cautionary notices

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Maldives: New trademark legislation ends era of cautionary notices

Sponsored by

spoor-fisher-400px.png
Houses on water in the Maldives

The introduction of a formal registration system under the Trademark Act modernises brand protection in the Maldives and signals a historic shift for rights holders, says Matthew Costard of Spoor & Fisher Jersey

On November 11 2025, the Republic of Maldives enacted the Trademark Act (Law No. 19/2025), creating the country’s first comprehensive statutory framework for trademark protection. This landmark legislation will come into force 12 months after its enactment, on November 11 2026, replacing the long-standing informal practice of publishing cautionary notices with a modern registration regime aligned with international standards. The act introduces a robust examination procedure, structured opposition processes, and remedies for infringement and counterfeiting.

The Trademark Act will operate in conjunction with the Maldives Intellectual Property Office Act 2025 (Law No. 12/2025), which establishes the institutional infrastructure for intellectual property administration and is set to come into effect on January 1 2026.

The regulations covering procedures, fees, and operational requirements have not yet been published, but they must be in place no later than May 11 2027.

Key features of the Trademark Act

The most notable aspects of the Trademark Act are as follows:

  • Broad definition of a trademark as “any sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from those of another”, including names, letters, numbers, figurative elements, symbols, shapes, patterns, and combinations thereof;

  • Provision for certification and collective marks;

  • Provision for claiming convention priority (although it should be noted that the Maldives has not yet acceded to the Paris Convention);

  • Protection for well-known marks;

  • Examination on absolute and relative grounds;

  • Three-month opposition period from publication;

  • Ten-year registration terms;

  • Six-month grace period for renewal;

  • Vulnerability to cancellation for non-use after five years from registration;

  • Civil and criminal remedies for infringement and counterfeiting; and

  • Border control enforcement.

Status of existing cautionary notices

There are no express transitional provisions covering cautionary notices, which means that trademark owners should not be able to claim statutory priority or seniority for marks based solely on their publication history. On the other hand, it is anticipated that existing cautionary notice publications may serve as valuable evidence of prior use and established trademark rights when applying for formal registration. While this may not constitute legal priority under the act, such evidence could be relevant in examination proceedings or disputes regarding trademark validity and ownership.

In these circumstances, it is strongly recommended that trademark owners maintain their existing cautionary notice publications until the new registration system is up and running.

Transitional period

It has been reported that there will be a 12-month transitional period (from November 11 2026 to November 11 2027), during which trademark owners that previously relied on cautionary notices must formally register their marks in order to preserve their prior ‘rights’. In the absence of express transitional provisions granting priority or seniority rights to trademarks that were published as cautionary notices, it is difficult to see how this would work. Hopefully, the position will be clarified when the regulations are published.

Summary

The Trademark Act represents a historic modernisation of the Maldives’ brand-protection landscape. It introduces the country’s first formal registration system for trademarks and replaces the informal practice of publishing cautionary notices. With the act taking effect on November 11 2026, rights holders should review their portfolios and prepare for a timely transition to avoid loss of protection.

For more information, email info@spoor.co.uk.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A decision on a licensing rate payable by Warner Bros and Paramount, and a survey outlining UK businesses’ lack of IP preparation ahead of launching abroad, were among other major talking points
A fresh wave of deals highlights why investors favour IP firms and why independent outfits may soon have to rethink their strategy
King & Spalding has now hired 15 partners from Winston Taylor and legacy firm Winston & Strawn in offices spanning Texas, San Francisco, and Chicago
Firm says its work with a biotech client could signal a sea change in how - and when - law firms enter the drug development process
Evan Lazerowitz, attorney in Robinson + Cole’s bankruptcy and reorganisation group, offers key takeaways for IP interested parties in bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings
While the UK sees heavy IP rankings movement, Germany’s new tiered UPC table signals a shift from early adoption to market maturity
In an exclusive interview, Bernard Ledeboer reveals how a Consolid-backed group of firms wants to expand across Europe, invest in AI and centralise operations to compete at the top tier
Not all private equity firms are the same, so leaders at four externally backed IP firms came together to discuss the frameworks they followed and how they ensured a cultural fit
Top-tier German and Spanish firms are among the advisers on a Europe-wide copyright and licensing tussle concerning the design of the track circuit in Madrid
Partners Alex Wilson and Andreas Kramer say bigger law firm rivals don’t necessarily gain by having a wider jurisdictional reach
Gift this article