Court rules ARIPO trademarks designating mainland Tanzania are not enforceable

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Court rules ARIPO trademarks designating mainland Tanzania are not enforceable

Sponsored by

spoor-fisher-400px.png
Hot air balloon in the colours of the Tanzanian flag

Duncan Maguire of Spoor & Fisher Jersey explains a recent ruling by the Court of Appeal of Tanzania confirming that such trademarks are unenforceable unless registered nationally with the trademarks office in Tanzania

The Court of Appeal of Tanzania issued a decision on September 26 2025 confirming that African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO) trademarks designating Tanzania (mainland) are not enforceable.

The ruling aligns with Spoor & Fisher’s view. This is because the Banjul Protocol on Marks, which provides for trademark registration for member states such as Tanzania, has not been specifically incorporated into the Trade and Service Marks Act, 1986 in Tanzania and is therefore of no effect in mainland Tanzania.

The Court of Appeal judges in Lakairo Industries Group & Others v Kenafric Industries & Others (2022) ruled that the appellants’ trademarks could not have infringed the first respondent’s ARIPO trademarks designating mainland Tanzania because “it is common ground […] that Tanzania had not ratified the corresponding Banjul Protocol”.

Trademark owners must secure national trademark registrations with the trademarks office in mainland Tanzania to obtain valid and enforceable trademark rights in mainland Tanzania.

ARIPO was established under the Lusaka Agreement of 1976 and originally named the Industrial Property Organization for English-Speaking Africa. Its objective was to provide centralised registration of patents and industrial designs and to promote the harmonisation of intellectual property legislation. Trademark registration was not catered for until the Banjul Protocol on Marks came into effect in 1997.

It is important to note that patents and utility models are governed by the Harare Protocol and that ARIPO patents and utility models designating mainland Tanzania are valid and enforceable.

In summary, this Court of Appeal decision only applies to trademarks and confirms that national trademark registrations must be obtained with the trademarks office in mainland Tanzania to obtain valid and enforceable trademark rights.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Three successive wins have got the firm eyeing additional opportunities as ITC work booms
While many firms remain focused on generative AI, recent hires and practice launches suggest the next battle may be for lawyers who understand how AI is moving into the physical world
The explosion of data centres has prompted patent pool operators to create new licensing opportunities
The court struck out copyright claims brought by Ladbrokes owner Entain, saying that ownership details should have been completed before litigation began
Düsseldorf has overtaken Munich as the UPC's busiest division, while firms including Winston Taylor, Clifford Chance, and Hoyng Rokh Monegier featured in disputes involving Abbott, Essity, Amazon and Hurom
The managing partner gave up an equity partnership track in New York to build a practice in India. More than a decade later, she discusses entrepreneurship, leadership, and why women should not wait before taking the next step
Vice presidents Shinya Jitsuhiro and Hirohisa Suzuki discuss litigation trends in Japan, recruitment challenges and clients’ international expansion
IP boutique Petillion represented IKEA in the dispute, which concerned the use of the multinational’s trademarks in an immigration-focused campaign. The firm tells Managing IP how it secured the outcome
The Pizzeys-Griffith Hack integration was designed to create a stronger Australian IP platform but with several ex-Pizzeys principals now gone, the deal's success may depend on where clients place their trust
Thomas Lonsdale and Hsu Min Chung of HGF explore the practical impact of the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal’s decision in G1/25 and its interplay with G1/24
Gift this article