Court rules ARIPO trademarks designating mainland Tanzania are not enforceable

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Court rules ARIPO trademarks designating mainland Tanzania are not enforceable

Sponsored by

spoor-fisher-400px.png
Hot air balloon in the colours of the Tanzanian flag

Duncan Maguire of Spoor & Fisher Jersey explains a recent ruling by the Court of Appeal of Tanzania confirming that such trademarks are unenforceable unless registered nationally with the trademarks office in Tanzania

The Court of Appeal of Tanzania issued a decision on September 26 2025 confirming that African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO) trademarks designating Tanzania (mainland) are not enforceable.

The ruling aligns with Spoor & Fisher’s view. This is because the Banjul Protocol on Marks, which provides for trademark registration for member states such as Tanzania, has not been specifically incorporated into the Trade and Service Marks Act, 1986 in Tanzania and is therefore of no effect in mainland Tanzania.

The Court of Appeal judges in Lakairo Industries Group & Others v Kenafric Industries & Others (2022) ruled that the appellants’ trademarks could not have infringed the first respondent’s ARIPO trademarks designating mainland Tanzania because “it is common ground […] that Tanzania had not ratified the corresponding Banjul Protocol”.

Trademark owners must secure national trademark registrations with the trademarks office in mainland Tanzania to obtain valid and enforceable trademark rights in mainland Tanzania.

ARIPO was established under the Lusaka Agreement of 1976 and originally named the Industrial Property Organization for English-Speaking Africa. Its objective was to provide centralised registration of patents and industrial designs and to promote the harmonisation of intellectual property legislation. Trademark registration was not catered for until the Banjul Protocol on Marks came into effect in 1997.

It is important to note that patents and utility models are governed by the Harare Protocol and that ARIPO patents and utility models designating mainland Tanzania are valid and enforceable.

In summary, this Court of Appeal decision only applies to trademarks and confirms that national trademark registrations must be obtained with the trademarks office in mainland Tanzania to obtain valid and enforceable trademark rights.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers say attention will turn to the UK government’s AI consultation after judgment fails to match pre-trial hype
Susan Keston and Rachel Fetches at HGF explain why the CoA’s decision to grant the UPC’s first permanent injunction demonstrates the court’s readiness to diverge from national court judgments
IP, M&A, life sciences and competition partners advised on deal that brings together brands such as ‘Huggies’ and ‘Kleenex’ with ‘Band-Aid’ and ‘Tylenol’
Stability AI, represented by Bird & Bird, is not liable for secondary copyright infringement, though Fieldfisher client Getty succeeds in some trademark claims
Plasseraud IP says it is eyeing AI and quantum computing expertise with new hire from Cabinet Netter
In the fifth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss the ‘Careers in Ideas’ network and how to open access to the profession
McGuireWoods’ focussed experimentation and disciplined execution of AI tools is sharpening its IP practice
As Marshall Gerstein celebrates its 70-year anniversary, Jeffrey Sharp, managing partner, reflects on lessons that shaped both his career and the firm’s success
News of two pharma deals involving Novo Nordisk and GSK and a loss for Open AI were also among the top talking points
Howard Hogan, IP partner at Gibson Dunn, says AI deepfakes are driving lawyers to rethink how IP protects creativity and innovation
Gift this article