Court rules ARIPO trademarks designating mainland Tanzania are not enforceable

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Court rules ARIPO trademarks designating mainland Tanzania are not enforceable

Sponsored by

spoor-fisher-400px.png
Hot air balloon in the colours of the Tanzanian flag

Duncan Maguire of Spoor & Fisher Jersey explains a recent ruling by the Court of Appeal of Tanzania confirming that such trademarks are unenforceable unless registered nationally with the trademarks office in Tanzania

The Court of Appeal of Tanzania issued a decision on September 26 2025 confirming that African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO) trademarks designating Tanzania (mainland) are not enforceable.

The ruling aligns with Spoor & Fisher’s view. This is because the Banjul Protocol on Marks, which provides for trademark registration for member states such as Tanzania, has not been specifically incorporated into the Trade and Service Marks Act, 1986 in Tanzania and is therefore of no effect in mainland Tanzania.

The Court of Appeal judges in Lakairo Industries Group & Others v Kenafric Industries & Others (2022) ruled that the appellants’ trademarks could not have infringed the first respondent’s ARIPO trademarks designating mainland Tanzania because “it is common ground […] that Tanzania had not ratified the corresponding Banjul Protocol”.

Trademark owners must secure national trademark registrations with the trademarks office in mainland Tanzania to obtain valid and enforceable trademark rights in mainland Tanzania.

ARIPO was established under the Lusaka Agreement of 1976 and originally named the Industrial Property Organization for English-Speaking Africa. Its objective was to provide centralised registration of patents and industrial designs and to promote the harmonisation of intellectual property legislation. Trademark registration was not catered for until the Banjul Protocol on Marks came into effect in 1997.

It is important to note that patents and utility models are governed by the Harare Protocol and that ARIPO patents and utility models designating mainland Tanzania are valid and enforceable.

In summary, this Court of Appeal decision only applies to trademarks and confirms that national trademark registrations must be obtained with the trademarks office in mainland Tanzania to obtain valid and enforceable trademark rights.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, ELTEMATE
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
The chief technology officer remit, which has been created as the firm is building its litigation team, will include expanding the use of AI in patent and legal work and automating manual processes
Former Hoyng Rokh Moneiger partner Laura Alonso, who brought her team to ECIJA in March, discusses plans to expand further and why ECIJA’s ‘IP DNA’ is helping broaden her work
Amita Haylock discusses building an integrated Asia practice as clients increasingly demand that firms combine IP, technology and data expertise
François Pochart, Grégoire Desrousseaux and Lionel Martin, long-standing figures in the firm’s patent litigation team, are set to help launch a Paris-based litigation offering
The Unitary Patent has passed 100,000 registrations, but new data raises the question of whether 30% uptake is a ceiling or a staging post for further growth, say Michael Nielsen and Darren Smyth of EIP and Andrew Samm at Patently
The new generation of in-house IP leaders want commercial judgment, accessibility and flexibility, with AI raising expectations around both fees and delivery
Gift this article