Court rules ARIPO trademarks designating mainland Tanzania are not enforceable

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Court rules ARIPO trademarks designating mainland Tanzania are not enforceable

Sponsored by

spoor-fisher-400px.png
Hot air balloon in the colours of the Tanzanian flag

Duncan Maguire of Spoor & Fisher Jersey explains a recent ruling by the Court of Appeal of Tanzania confirming that such trademarks are unenforceable unless registered nationally with the trademarks office in Tanzania

The Court of Appeal of Tanzania issued a decision on September 26 2025 confirming that African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO) trademarks designating Tanzania (mainland) are not enforceable.

The ruling aligns with Spoor & Fisher’s view. This is because the Banjul Protocol on Marks, which provides for trademark registration for member states such as Tanzania, has not been specifically incorporated into the Trade and Service Marks Act, 1986 in Tanzania and is therefore of no effect in mainland Tanzania.

The Court of Appeal judges in Lakairo Industries Group & Others v Kenafric Industries & Others (2022) ruled that the appellants’ trademarks could not have infringed the first respondent’s ARIPO trademarks designating mainland Tanzania because “it is common ground […] that Tanzania had not ratified the corresponding Banjul Protocol”.

Trademark owners must secure national trademark registrations with the trademarks office in mainland Tanzania to obtain valid and enforceable trademark rights in mainland Tanzania.

ARIPO was established under the Lusaka Agreement of 1976 and originally named the Industrial Property Organization for English-Speaking Africa. Its objective was to provide centralised registration of patents and industrial designs and to promote the harmonisation of intellectual property legislation. Trademark registration was not catered for until the Banjul Protocol on Marks came into effect in 1997.

It is important to note that patents and utility models are governed by the Harare Protocol and that ARIPO patents and utility models designating mainland Tanzania are valid and enforceable.

In summary, this Court of Appeal decision only applies to trademarks and confirms that national trademark registrations must be obtained with the trademarks office in mainland Tanzania to obtain valid and enforceable trademark rights.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Erise IP has added a seven-practitioner trademark team from Hovey Williams, signalling its intention to help clients at all stages of development
News of prison sentences for ex-Samsung executives for trade secrets violation and an opposition filed by Taylor Swift were also among the top talking points
A multijurisdictional claim filed by InterDigital and a new spin-off firm in Germany were also among the top talking points
Duarte Lima, MD of Spruson & Ferguson’s Asia practice, says practitioners must adapt to process changes within IP systems, as well as be mindful of the implications of tech on their practices
Practitioners say the UK Supreme Court’s decision could boost the attractiveness of the UK for AI companies
New awards, including US ‘Firm of the Year’ and Latin America ‘Firm to Watch’, are among more than 90 prizes that will recognise firms and practitioners
DWF helped client Dairy UK secure a major victory at the UK Supreme Court
Hepworth Browne led Emotional Perception AI to victory at the UK Supreme Court, which rejected a previous appellate decision that said an AI network was not patentable
James Hill, general counsel at Norwich City FC, reveals how he balances fan engagement with brand enforcement, and when he calls on IP firms for advice
In the second of a two-part article, Gabrielle Faure-André and Stéphanie Garçon at Santarelli unpick EPO, UPC and French case law to assess the importance of clinical development timelines in inventive step analyses
Gift this article