New South African Plant Breeders’ Rights Act enters into force

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New South African Plant Breeders’ Rights Act enters into force

Sponsored by

spoor-fisher-400px.png
Protea in the forefront of a South African landscape

David Cochrane of Spoor & Fisher South Africa explains the key updates under the act, which strengthens breeder protections while supporting vulnerable farmers and aligning with international norms

A major update to South Africa’s plant breeders’ rights system officially took effect on June 1 2025, with the publication of supporting regulations on June 13 2025. The new Plant Breeders’ Rights Act, No. 12 of 2018, replaces the previous law from 1976, bringing South Africa’s system in line with global standards.

The new act gives stronger protection to plant breeders, while also considering the needs of smallholder, vulnerable, and subsistence farmers. It forms part of South Africa’s efforts to support agricultural innovation and comply with the 1991 Act of the UPOV Convention, an international agreement that promotes the protection of new plant varieties and is administered by the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV).

The key changes under the new act are as follows:

  • Longer protection periods – registered plant varieties now benefit from extended terms of protection: up to 30 years for crops such as fruit trees, vines, sugarcane, and potatoes, and 25 years for all other crops.

  • Stricter rules for using protected seeds – the well-known ‘farmer’s privilege’, allowing farmers to save seed for future use, now applies only to small-scale, vulnerable, and subsistence farmers. Commercial farmers must obtain permission and pay royalties if they want to save and replant seeds from protected varieties.

  • Criminal penalties for infringement – using protected plant varieties without authorisation is now a criminal offence, with penalties including fines or imprisonment for up to 10 years.

  • Exclusive breeders’ rights extended – breeders have exclusive rights to their varieties for longer periods: eight years for certain crops, such as fruit trees and sugarcane, and five years for others.

  • Provisional protection on filing – breeders now receive automatic provisional protection as soon as they file an application, providing earlier safeguards.

  • Updated timeframes for plant material submissions – plant material for testing must be submitted within two years for most crops and within five years for potatoes, trees, and vines. Extensions can be granted under certain circumstances.

  • Clearer rules and definitions – the new act provides more certainty, defining terms such as “sale” and clarifying that processed products made from harvested material are protected. It also states that preparing plant material for sale (known as “conditioning”) may infringe breeders’ rights.

  • Limits on saved seed for small-scale farmers – the regulations outline how much seed smallholder and vulnerable farmers can save and share, which is significantly lower than early proposals. For example, the permitted amount of saved seed for groundnuts drops from 2,000 kg to 50 kg, maize from 3,000 kg to 12 kg, and fruit crops from 100 kg to just 5 kg per kind.

The importance of South Africa’s new Plant Breeders’ Rights Act

The updated law strikes a balance between encouraging innovation and protecting food security for vulnerable communities. It strengthens legal certainty for breeders, supports South Africa’s agricultural sector, and promotes international trade by aligning with the standards of the 1991 Act of the UPOV Convention.

This is a significant milestone for South Africa’s plant breeders, farmers, and the broader agricultural economy.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The complaint follows a declaratory ruling issued by the England and Wales High Court last month that said Samsung is entitled to an interim licence
Tobias Hahn explains how the firm's multi-jurisdictional setup enabled it to secure an injunction on behalf of Fujifilm relating to defendant Kodak’s non-UPC activity
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
Litigator Neel Chatterjee, who has joined the firm as a co-leader of the IP team, reveals tech ambitions and expansion plans
A settlement between Philips and Transsion and a loss for AstraZeneca in the UK were also among the top talking points
Working with Harvey and Microsoft, the firm has been at the forefront of developing AI tools for its lawyers, and is now exploring new projects and business models
The Emotional Perception AI case, which centres on the patentability of an artificial neural network, will be heard next week
Developments included a court order related to InterDigital’s anti-anti-suit injunction against Disney, and clarification on recoverable costs
Partners at Foley Hoag examine how recent CJEU jurisprudence may serve as a catalyst for recalibrating US judicial reluctance to entertain foreign patent claims
International law firms have high hopes for their IP practices in Saudi Arabia, with many opening offices, but recruiting and retaining talent in the Kingdom presents unique challenges
Gift this article