Tech transfer: capitalising on homegrown scientific innovation

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Tech transfer: capitalising on homegrown scientific innovation

Sponsored by

Logo 22.07.22.png
Network data transfer speed

Tech transfer bridges the gap between lab and market, helping research institutions turn innovations into real-world impact. This CAS article explores the strategies, challenges, and solutions in unlocking the full value of scientific discovery

Innovation is the lifeblood of scientific progress, but without the right tools and strategies to bring those innovations to market, groundbreaking ideas can often remain stuck in the lab. By transferring ideas and patented inventions from research institutions to the commercial world, tech transfer accelerates the development of new technologies and drives economic growth.

The value of tech transfer

In recent years, tech transfer has become a critical innovation driver across industries. Pursuing research with the expectation that discoveries will eventually find their way into the marketplace is not a sustainable, or even viable, model in today’s competitive R&D landscape. Research institutions are increasingly turning to tech transfer to bridge the gap between innovation and commercialisation.

Private licensing of publicly funded inventions has generated numerous groundbreaking products, including the cancer drug paclitaxel (Taxol), hepatitis B vaccines, the leukaemia drug imatinib (Gleevec or Glivec), water sanitisers, light-emitting diodes, and artificial joints – transforming ideas into marketable products that enhance lives around the world. While strategies vary significantly between institutions across the world, one thing remains clear: effective tech transfer is essential for maximising the potential of scientific research.

Barriers to successful tech transfer

Despite its importance, institutions face a plethora of challenges when attempting to develop tech transfer processes, such as:

  • Lack of expertise – many research institutes need more experienced business professionals with practical, hands-on expertise in their tech transfer offices;

  • Limited information access – comprehensive and up-to-date access to patent filings is essential to making confident decisions and innovating in the areas with the most intellectual property (IP) opportunities;

  • Misunderstood metrics – while patent activity is critical, sheer patent volume does not always correlate with tech transfer success;

  • Funding gaps – while tech transfer provides research institutions with additional financial support, considerable funding gaps can still arise where research is not yet ready for commercialisation;

  • IP ownership conflicts – with multiple parties involved in the research-to-commercialisation pipeline, disputes over the ownership of IP can delay or prevent tech transfer; and

  • Cultural differences – the environment, values, and priorities of academia and industry can be so different that they prevent successful collaboration, as seen in the “European Paradox”, where Europe produces significant research but struggles to commercialise it effectively.

Unlocking the future of tech transfer

As tech transfer continues to become an essential part of global R&D ecosystems, countries and institutions must continue to invest in the infrastructure and expertise needed to turn discoveries into marketable products. Critical opportunities for development include:

  • Investing in comprehensive patent information;

  • Leveraging public-private partnerships;

  • Focusing on applied research;

  • Investing in experienced personnel;

  • Normalising investment based on return; and

  • Incentivising researchers for commercialisation.

From boosting business expertise in tech transfer offices to fostering closer collaborations between universities and industries, the future of tech transfer and IP will depend on these key efforts to unlock new possibilities for scientific progress and economic growth.

Discover how CAS can support your tech transfer success with comprehensive IP insights. Learn more about the STN IP Protection Suite here.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Tilleke & Gibbins topped the leaderboard with four awards across the region, while Anand & Anand and Kim & Chang emerged as outstanding domestic firms
News of a new addition to Via LA’s Qi wireless charging patent pool, and potential fee increases at the UKIPO were also among the top talking points
Gift this article