Unlocking the potential of fast-track mergers in India

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Unlocking the potential of fast-track mergers in India

Sponsored by

Anand-Anand-cmyk.jpg
Colours of the Indian flag on the India Gate in New Delhi, with fast-moving traffic in the foreground.jpg

India has taken a significant step towards simplifying its corporate consolidation framework with the codification of fast-track mergers under the Companies Act, 2013. Governed by Section 233 and read with Rules 25 and 25A of the Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016 (as amended), this mechanism enables a select category of companies to bypass the otherwise lengthy and complex National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) process. In parallel, Section 234 of the Companies Act, 2013 facilitates cross-border mergers involving Indian and foreign companies, subject to regulatory approvals—most notably from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). With recent regulatory reforms, India is positioning itself as a favourable jurisdiction for inbound mergers, including the increasingly relevant concept of reverse flipping—the relocation of company domiciles from foreign countries back to India.

The fast-track route is available for companies which have two or more small companies; by a holding company and its wholly owned subsidiary; by two or more start-up companies and a start-u company with one or more small companies. This is also the reason why companies with relatively straightforward structures benefit from expedited procedures. The process commences with the preparation of a scheme of merger, which is then shared with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) and the Official Liquidator (OL) for their feedback. The company must also submit a Declaration of Solvency confirming its financial health. Approval from shareholders and creditors is crucial—requiring affirmative votes from at least 90% in value and number. Once approved internally, the scheme is submitted to the Regional Director (RD). If satisfied, the RD may approve the merger directly. However, if public interest concerns or procedural anomalies are found, the case is referred to the NCLT.

In response to industry feedback, India’s Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has progressively streamlined the process. A major reform came in September 2024 with the introduction of Rule 25A(5), allowing inbound mergers—specifically, the merger of a foreign holding company with its wholly-owned Indian subsidiary under the fast-track route. This amendment is a game-changer for reverse flipping—a phenomenon where Indian-founded companies, previously domiciled abroad for regulatory or investment reasons, shift their base back to India. Previously routed through NCLT, these transactions can now leverage the fast-track process, provided they comply with the RBI’s Foreign Exchange Management (Cross Border Merger) Regulations, 2018. Notably, compliance with these regulations is deemed RBI approval, which is facilitated via Authorized Dealer Banks.

Following the September 2024 amendments, Dream Sports Inc. (USA), the parent of popular fantasy sports platform Dream11, successfully completed a reverse flip through India’s fast-track merger route. Its wholly owned Indian subsidiary, Sporta Technologies Pvt. Ltd., passed a board resolution on January 6, 2025, initiating the process under Section 233. Within three months, the Regional Director granted approval, marking the first such inbound merger under the amended fast-track framework. This landmark deal is expected to set a precedent for other global-facing Indian startups considering repatriation of their corporate domicile.

India’s evolving legal architecture around corporate mergers—particularly in the cross-border context—signals its broader ambition to become a global hub for business and innovation. By offering regulatory clarity, defined timelines, and built-in mechanisms for deemed approvals, the Indian government is not only easing the compliance burden but also making a compelling case for startups and investors to anchor themselves in India. With policies aligned to boost ‘Ease of Doing Business’, fast-track mergers and the facilitation of reverse flipping reflect a forward-thinking approach—balancing regulatory prudence with commercial agility. As more high-growth enterprises return to Indian shores, this could mark the beginning of a broader trend in reshoring corporate value and nurturing homegrown innovation ecosystems.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article