Unlocking the potential of fast-track mergers in India

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Unlocking the potential of fast-track mergers in India

Sponsored by

Anand-Anand-cmyk.jpg
Colours of the Indian flag on the India Gate in New Delhi, with fast-moving traffic in the foreground.jpg

India has taken a significant step towards simplifying its corporate consolidation framework with the codification of fast-track mergers under the Companies Act, 2013. Governed by Section 233 and read with Rules 25 and 25A of the Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016 (as amended), this mechanism enables a select category of companies to bypass the otherwise lengthy and complex National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) process. In parallel, Section 234 of the Companies Act, 2013 facilitates cross-border mergers involving Indian and foreign companies, subject to regulatory approvals—most notably from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). With recent regulatory reforms, India is positioning itself as a favourable jurisdiction for inbound mergers, including the increasingly relevant concept of reverse flipping—the relocation of company domiciles from foreign countries back to India.

The fast-track route is available for companies which have two or more small companies; by a holding company and its wholly owned subsidiary; by two or more start-up companies and a start-u company with one or more small companies. This is also the reason why companies with relatively straightforward structures benefit from expedited procedures. The process commences with the preparation of a scheme of merger, which is then shared with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) and the Official Liquidator (OL) for their feedback. The company must also submit a Declaration of Solvency confirming its financial health. Approval from shareholders and creditors is crucial—requiring affirmative votes from at least 90% in value and number. Once approved internally, the scheme is submitted to the Regional Director (RD). If satisfied, the RD may approve the merger directly. However, if public interest concerns or procedural anomalies are found, the case is referred to the NCLT.

In response to industry feedback, India’s Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has progressively streamlined the process. A major reform came in September 2024 with the introduction of Rule 25A(5), allowing inbound mergers—specifically, the merger of a foreign holding company with its wholly-owned Indian subsidiary under the fast-track route. This amendment is a game-changer for reverse flipping—a phenomenon where Indian-founded companies, previously domiciled abroad for regulatory or investment reasons, shift their base back to India. Previously routed through NCLT, these transactions can now leverage the fast-track process, provided they comply with the RBI’s Foreign Exchange Management (Cross Border Merger) Regulations, 2018. Notably, compliance with these regulations is deemed RBI approval, which is facilitated via Authorized Dealer Banks.

Following the September 2024 amendments, Dream Sports Inc. (USA), the parent of popular fantasy sports platform Dream11, successfully completed a reverse flip through India’s fast-track merger route. Its wholly owned Indian subsidiary, Sporta Technologies Pvt. Ltd., passed a board resolution on January 6, 2025, initiating the process under Section 233. Within three months, the Regional Director granted approval, marking the first such inbound merger under the amended fast-track framework. This landmark deal is expected to set a precedent for other global-facing Indian startups considering repatriation of their corporate domicile.

India’s evolving legal architecture around corporate mergers—particularly in the cross-border context—signals its broader ambition to become a global hub for business and innovation. By offering regulatory clarity, defined timelines, and built-in mechanisms for deemed approvals, the Indian government is not only easing the compliance burden but also making a compelling case for startups and investors to anchor themselves in India. With policies aligned to boost ‘Ease of Doing Business’, fast-track mergers and the facilitation of reverse flipping reflect a forward-thinking approach—balancing regulatory prudence with commercial agility. As more high-growth enterprises return to Indian shores, this could mark the beginning of a broader trend in reshoring corporate value and nurturing homegrown innovation ecosystems.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
Gift this article